Radiology Work Allocation System with Dynamic Threshold Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In healthcare environments, distributing medical exams for review among radiologists is inefficient and inequitable due to the lack of effective tools for managing workloads, availability, and workflow balancing across a network of radiologists and hospitals.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for distributing medical exams that includes a graphical user interface for radiologists and administrators to manage examiner availability, workload, and specialty parameters, using load-balancing rules to automatically allocate exams based on radiologist profiles and real-time updates, facilitating immediate review and dynamic workload management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual distribution methods are used to allocate medical exams to radiologists, then flexibility and control over individual assignments is maintained, but the process becomes time-consuming and results in inequitable workload distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual control over exam assignmentVSAvoidexam distribution efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automatic exam allocation based on predefined criteria. The workload distribution system automatically assigns exams to radiologists without requiring manual intervention, allowing the system to serve itself by making allocation decisions based on radiologist availability, specialty, and current workload levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters dynamically by monitoring and updating radiologist availability status, workload metrics, and specialty classifications in real-time. These parameter changes enable the system to adapt exam allocation decisions to current conditions, improving both efficiency and equity while maintaining operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If automatic allocation systems are implemented to improve exam distribution efficiency, then productivity increases, but system complexity and difficulty in managing allocation rules increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexam distribution efficiencyVSAvoidworkload management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex allocation process into distinct, manageable modules: radiologist profiling, availability monitoring, workload calculation, and exam matching. Each module handles a specific aspect of the allocation process, making the overall system more manageable and easier to implement despite the complexity of the task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer of automation that mediates between manual control and complete autonomy. This intermediary system handles the complex calculations and decision-making, while allowing administrators to set high-level parameters and radiologists to provide input data, thus reducing direct human involvement in complex allocation decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If real-time availability tracking is implemented to ensure equitable workload distribution, then fairness and workload balancing improve, but the need for continuous updates and system maintenance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload distribution fairnessVSAvoidreal-time tracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor radiologist availability, workload status, and allocation outcomes. This feedback information is used to dynamically adjust future allocation decisions, ensuring equitable workload distribution while allowing the system to learn from past performance and improve over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system embraces dynamics by making allocation criteria flexible and adaptable to changing conditions. Radiologist availability, workload thresholds, and priority levels can be dynamically adjusted based on institutional needs, ensuring the system remains reliable and fair while adapting to evolving requirements without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11810666B2Systems and methods for intelligent radiology work allocation
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US11810666B2 patent drawing
  • US11810666B2 patent drawing
  • US11810666B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example system includes a processor to assign a first medical exam to a first examiner based on a workload availability threshold for the first examiner and an examiner availability indicator for the first examiner. The processor can deliver the first medical exam to one of a reading tool displayed via a first graphical user interface or an examiner work queue displayed via a second graphical user interface. The processor can automatically adjust a workload availability threshold for a second examiner and the first examiner based on a first adjustment, assign a second medical exam to the first examiner or the second examiner based on the respective adjusted work availability thresholds for the first examiner and the second examiner, and auto-serve additional medical exams to the first examiner or the second examiner based on a priority level of the additional medical exams.