Radiotherapy Arc Sequencing With ML Aperture Refinement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radiation therapy treatment planning is time-consuming and subjective, often requiring trial-and-error processes to balance target dose and organ-at-risk sparing, with existing methods struggling to efficiently generate high-quality treatment plans that minimize dose to surrounding tissues.

Innovation Solution

The use of a trained machine learning model, such as a neural network, to generate control point images and optimize radiotherapy treatment plans by predicting control point values based on patient anatomy and fluence data, reducing the complexity of arc sequencing and aperture optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional trial-and-error methods are used to create treatment plans, then planners can manually adjust parameters to meet clinical objectives, but the process becomes extremely time-consuming and complex especially when multiple organs at risk are involved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment plan qualityVSAvoidplan creation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical trial-and-error adjustment process with an automated machine learning system. The neural network model automatically generates control point values and optimizes treatment plans based on input imaging data, eliminating the need for manual parameter tuning while maintaining or improving plan quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service treatment planning where the machine learning model autonomously generates and optimizes treatment plans without requiring continuous human intervention. The model learns from training data and independently performs the complex optimization task that traditionally required skilled planners to manually adjust parameters over extended periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual delineation and optimization techniques are used, then treatment plans can be customized for individual patients, but the complexity increases significantly with more organs at risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment plan customizationVSAvoidplanning process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the treatment planning process by using a machine learning model that directly predicts optimal control point values from imaging data. This approach maintains the ability to customize treatment plans for individual patients while avoiding the exponential complexity increase that occurs with manual methods when multiple organs at risk are involved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional arc sequencing and aperture optimization methods are used, then treatment plans can be generated, but the process lacks objectivity and consistency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplan generation capabilityVSAvoidplan quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback through the machine learning model that has been trained on extensive treatment plan data. The model learns from historical successful plans and applies this knowledge to generate consistent, high-quality plans for new patients. This feedback mechanism ensures objectivity and reliability by base d on proven patterns rather than subjective manual judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240207645A1Radiotherapy optimization for arc sequencing and aperture refinement
Publication Date: 2024.06.27 ELEKTA AB
  • US20240207645A1 patent drawing
  • US20240207645A1 patent drawing
  • US20240207645A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for generating radiotherapy machine parameters used in a radiotherapy treatment plan, based on machine learning prediction. The systems and methods include: obtaining three-dimensional image data which indicates target dose areas and organs-at-risk areas of a subject; generating anatomy projection images from the image data, each anatomy projection image providing a view from a respective beam angle of the radiotherapy treatment; using a trained neural network model (trained with corresponding pairs of anatomy projection images and control point images) to generate control point images, each control point image indicating an intensity and aperture(s) of a control point of the radiotherapy treatment to apply at a respective beam angle; and generating a set of final control points for use in the radiotherapy treatment to control a radiotherapy treatment machine, based on optimization of the control points indicated by the generated control point images.