RAG Query Retrieval Using Feedback-Tuned Knowledge Fragment Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods fail to capture user preferences and usage habits due to the limitations of pre-trained embedding models, leading to inconsistent and inaccurate retrieval results.

Innovation Solution

Implement a retrieval-augmented generation method that utilizes a trained embedding model to convert query statements into knowledge fragments, followed by a recommendation model based on Bi-LSTM networks to sequence and optimize results based on user interactions, thereby aligning with user preferences and habits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a pre-trained embedding model is used to convert query statements into knowledge fragments, then the retrieval process can be automated and scaled, but the system cannot capture user preferences and usage habits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of retrieval processVSAvoidability to capture user preferences
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by recording user selections from the retrieved knowledge fragments and using this feedback to retrain the embedding model. This allows the model to learn from actual user behavior patterns and adapt to individual preferences over time, resolving the contradiction between automated retrieval and adaptability to user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The embedding model transitions from a static pre-trained model to a dynamic model that continuously updates its parameters based on user feedback. This dynamic adaptation enables the system to maintain automation while developing the ability to capture and respond to evolving user preferences and usage habits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If the same embedding model is used for all queries, then the system maintains consistency and simplicity, but it cannot provide customized results for different users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of embedding processVSAvoidcustomization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the embedding process into two distinct stages: an initial pre-trained embedding phase that maintains simplicity and consistency, and a subsequent fine-tuning phase that incorporates user-specific feedback. This segmentation allows the system to preserve the simplicity of the base model while adding customization capability through targeted updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of creating completely different embedding models for each user, the system applies local quality by making targeted adjustments to the embedding model parameters based on individual user feedback patterns. This allows customization for specific users without redesigning the entire embedding system, maintaining overall simplicity while enabling personalized results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Stability of the object's composition

If pre-trained models with fixed parameters are used, then the model parameters remain stable and reproducible, but the retrieval results cannot adapt to user-specific needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of model parametersVSAvoidprecision of retrieval results
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by using a pre-trained embedding model with stable, fixed parameters to handle the majority of retrieval tasks. This pre-trained model provides consistent and reproducible results. Only when user feedback indicates a need for customization does the system proceed to fine-tune the model, thereby maintaining parameter stability for most cases while achieving high precision when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by modifying the embedding model parameters only after incorporating user feedback data. The pre-trained parameters remain stable during normal operation, and changes are made selectively based on user behavior patterns. This approach maintains the stability and reproducibility of the base model while enabling the precision needed for user-specific retrieval requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260037837A1Retrieval-augmented generation method, system, device, and medium and question-answering method
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 SHENZHEN INST OF ADVANCED TECH CHINESE ACAD OF SCI
  • US20260037837A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037837A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037837A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A retrieval-augmented generation method, system, device, and medium and a question-answering method are provided, belonging to the field of data processing technology. The retrieval-augmented generation method includes: acquiring a query statement to be retrieved; converting the query statement to be retrieved into K knowledge fragments to be augmented based on a trained embedding model; and inputting the K knowledge fragments to be augmented into the trained recommendation model to obtain several augmented knowledge fragments and their sequencing. The method, system, device, and medium can perform data interaction based on user preferences and usage habits.