RAG Knowledge Acquisition for Edge AI Classification Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Discriminative AI systems struggle when training datasets cannot describe the complete scenario, while generative AI systems face issues like hallucinations and high parameter requirements, limiting their effectiveness in complex scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid distributed inference system combining discriminative and generative AI models, with localized small foundation systems and centralized large foundation systems, utilizing retrieval augmented generation (RAG) to optimize classification and reduce computational resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If generative AI systems are used to generalize to data not in training set, then adaptability is improved, but hallucinations and large number of parameters increase system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneralization abilityVSAvoidnumber of parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the AI architecture into multiple specialized components: discriminative models for classification, generative models for data synthesis, and RAG modules for knowledge retrieval. Each component has a specific function and manageable parameter count, avoiding the need for a single large generative model while maintaining generalization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) as an intermediary mechanism between the model and external knowledge sources. This allows the system to generalize to unseen data by retrieving relevant information from training data rather than relying solely on internal parameters, reducing the parameter burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If discriminative AI systems are used for classification, then manufacturing precision is improved, but reliability deteriorates when training dataset cannot describe complete scenario

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidrobustness to unseen scenarios
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges discriminative and generative AI models into a hybrid architecture. The discriminative model provides accurate classification for known scenarios, while the generative model synthesizes relevant training examples to improve generalization to unseen scenarios, combining the strengths of both approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating synthetic training data and retrieving relevant examples before classification. This prepares the system to handle unseen scenarios by pre-synthesizing relevant training cases and making them available when needed, improving reliability without compromising classification precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If centralized large foundation systems are used, then adaptability is improved, but data transmission requirements and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneralization capabilityVSAvoiddata transmission volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local small foundation systems at edge sites that are specialized for local conditions and requirements. These local systems handle most classification tasks independently, reducing the need for centralized processing and data transmission. Only when local systems encounter uncertain cases do they interact with the centralized system, minimizing data transmission volume while maintaining adaptability through localized intelligence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If local small foundation systems are used at edge sites, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to distributed architecture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a dynamic distributed architecture where local and centralized components interact based on real-time needs. The architecture adapts its complexity by engaging only the necessary components for each task - local systems handle routine classifications independently, while the centralized system provides support only when needed, optimizing productivity without requiring full distributed complexity to be active simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260065083A1Knowledge acquisition for retrieval augmented generation system
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 DELL PROD LP
  • US20260065083A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065083A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065083A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure describes a retrieval augmented generation (RAG) knowledge acquirer. The RAG knowledge acquirer receives output data from a local small foundation system and a centralized foundation system both of which use a RAG system for a generative AI model. The RAG knowledge acquirer creates new enterprise data for an enhanced distributed RAG system used by the local small foundation system from the data. The new enterprise data is used to create query optimized representations (QORs). The RAG knowledge acquirer is connected to an external information repository allowing data sharing and federated learning with the other edge sites. The new enterprise data incorporates knowledge gained from previous inferences made by the local small foundation system and the centralized foundation system and improves the function of the local small foundation system keeping it customized and avoiding finetuning. The new enterprise data can also verify promoted local QORs.