RAG Query Execution With Citation Safeguards Against LLM Hallucinations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional data platforms lack sophisticated natural language understanding, dynamic response adaptation, and integrated citation mechanisms, leading to irrelevant, incomplete, and unverifiable search results, especially for complex queries.

Innovation Solution

A data platform utilizing advanced machine learning models, including Large Language Models (LLMs) for query processing and response generation, employs a multi-turn approach, retrieval-augmented generation, and a separate citations LLM to ensure contextually relevant, accurate, and verifiable responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional data platforms process queries using basic keyword matching and static response generation, then system complexity remains low, but response accuracy and relevance deteriorate for complex queries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the query processing into distinct functional modules: a prompt response LLM for generating initial responses, a separate citations LLM for verifying information, a document retrieval component for fetching source materials, and a multi-turn conversation handler for context management. This modular segmentation allows each component to specialize in specific tasks, improving overall response accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through clear separation of concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary citations verification mechanism that acts as a mediator between the prompt response LLM and the user. The separate citations LLM serves as an intermediary layer that verifies, validates, and sources information before presenting it to the user. This intermediary structure enhances response accuracy by adding a verification step without requiring complete system redesign, thus managing complexity effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the platform uses a single LLM for both response generation and citation verification, then device complexity is reduced, but response reliability and verification accuracy worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse reliabilityVSAvoidmodel architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the LLM functionality into two distinct specialized models: a prompt response LLM optimized for generating accurate and contextually relevant responses, and a separate citations LLM specialized in verifying information accuracy and generating proper citations. This segmentation allows each model to be fine-tuned for its specific function, thereby improving response reliability without requiring a single overly complex multi-functional model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each LLM is optimized with local quality - the prompt response LLM is tuned for response generation quality while the citations LLM is tuned for verification and citation quality. This localized optimization approach ensures that each component excels at its specific task, improving overall system reliability while keeping individual model complexities manageable and focused.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the platform processes queries without multi-turn context analysis, then processing speed increases, but understanding of query nuances and contextual relevance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequery understanding accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by analyzing and storing contextual information from conversation history before processing the current query. The multi-turn conversation handler pre-processes previous turns to extract relevant context, entities, and intent, preparing this information in advance for the current query processing. This preliminary context preparation improves query understanding accuracy by ensuring relevant contextual information is readily available without adding significant processing delay during the actual query response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by selectively processing only the most relevant portions of conversation history rather than analyzing every previous turn in full detail. The multi-turn handler identifies and focuses on key contextual elements that are directly relevant to the current query, performing excessive analysis only where needed to capture query nuances. This approach maintains processing efficiency while improving understanding accuracy for complex multi-turn queries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12613874B2Executing queries with hallucination safeguards
Publication Date: 2026.04.28 SNOWFLAKE INC
  • US12613874B2 patent drawing
  • US12613874B2 patent drawing
  • US12613874B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The described system aims to reduce or eliminate inaccuracies and hallucinations in responses generated by a machine learning model when processing user queries. The data platform parses and categorizes the text within data files to create structured textual representations. The user submits multiple prompts which are collectively assessed to refine and modify the initial queries. The modified query is used to identifying segments of data files that are most relevant to the query. These relevant portions are then compiled into a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) context block. This RAG context block is fed into a prompt response machine learning model, which processes the enriched information to generate a well-informed and accurate response to the user's query. Finally, this response is displayed back to the user through the chat interface, completing a cycle that enhances the reliability and relevance of machine-generated answers.