Rail Anchor With Extended Belly Section For Crosstie Restraint

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current rail anchors have a limited contact-bearing surface area, which reduces their ability to provide longitudinal restraint and can lead to unsafe rail conditions due to deterioration of wood crossties and embedding issues, especially in high-tonnage tracks and varying temperatures.

Innovation Solution

A rail anchor design with an increased contact-bearing surface area in the belly section, comprising a head, tail, and belly section with widened contact surfaces, formed through a manufacturing process involving forging, quenching, and tempering, to create a surface area of at least 3 square inches that extends 1.5 inches downward from the crosstie, maintaining stability without increasing weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the contact-bearing surface area of the rail anchor is increased, then the ability to provide longitudinal restraint and dissipate rail force is improved, but the weight of the rail anchor increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelongitudinal restraint abilityVSAvoidrail anchor weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the contact-bearing surface vertically downward from the crosstie top surface by at least 1.5 inches, utilizing the vertical dimension to increase bearing area without proportionally increasing horizontal footprint or weight. This dimensional approach allows the rail anchor to engage deeper into the crosstie material, improving longitudinal restraint capability while controlling weight through optimized geometry rather than simply adding mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the contact-bearing surface area is increased to prevent embedding, then the bearing pressure is reduced, but the rail anchor requires more material and becomes heavier

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveembedding into crosstieVSAvoidmaterial quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent concentrates the increased contact-bearing surface area specifically in the belly section where it contacts the crosstie side, rather than uniformly increasing the entire rail anchor structure. This localized quality enhancement reduces bearing pressure at the critical embedding point while minimizing additional material requirements by only expanding the surface area where it is most needed for preventing embedding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the rail anchor extends deeper into the crosstie to maintain contact as crossties deteriorate, then the longitudinal restraint is improved, but the installation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact maintenance as crosstie deterioratesVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the contact-bearing surface to dynamically adapt to crosstie deterioration by extending at least 1.5 inches downward, allowing the rail anchor to maintain contact as the crosstie surface degrades over time. The belly section geometry is configured to follow the contour of the crosstie side, enabling the structure to self-adjust to varying crosstie conditions without requiring complex adjustable mechanisms or multiple installation configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The increased bearing surface area disperses load on crossties, reduces damage to wood fibers, and maintains rail stability as crossties deteriorate, while avoiding weight and material cost increases, ensuring secure rail anchoring without additional equipment modifications.

Implementation Method 1

formed through a manufacturing process involving forging, quenching, and tempering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuenching:

Implementation Method 2

formed through a manufacturing process involving forging, quenching, and tempering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTempering:

Data Source

PatentUS9605385B2Rail anchor
Publication Date: 2017.03.28 LEWIS BOLT & NUT CO
  • US9605385B2 patent drawing
  • US9605385B2 patent drawing
  • US9605385B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including an apparatus that is a rail anchor comprising a head, a tail, and a belly section. The belly section comprises a top surface, a bottom surface, and two side surfaces. Each side surface comprises a contact-bearing surface area. The head comprises a bend along a length of the head. The tail comprises a notch. Each contact-bearing surface area has a surface area of at least 3 square inches and is adapted to extend at least 1.5 inches downward from the top of a railroad track crosstie along a side of the railroad track crosstie.