Rail Chamber Filling Element Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rail chamber filling elements face challenges in adapting to varying grid spacings, stability, stray current insulation, and ease of installation, particularly when not laterally supported by a road surface, and often require complex manufacturing and assembly processes.

Innovation Solution

The rail chamber filling element is designed with a base body made of harder rubber-elastic material and compression sections made of softer, compressible material, allowing for length adjustment and easy trimming to match the track grid, while maintaining stability and stray current insulation capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rail chamber filling elements are made of harder rubber-elastic material for stability and stray current insulation, then stability and insulation are improved, but the material becomes difficult to compress and trim on site

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability and stray current insulationVSAvoidease of trimming and compression on site
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The rail chamber filling element is divided into two distinct sections: a base body made of harder rubber-elastic material for stability and insulation, and a compression section made of softer, compressible material for easy adjustment. This segmentation allows each section to fulfill its specific function without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the filling element have different material properties tailored to their specific functions. The base body uses harder material for structural integrity and insulation, while the compression section uses softer material for compressibility and ease of trimming, achieving local optimization of material properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If rail chamber filling elements are designed as one-piece structures, then manufacturing is simplified, but adaptation to varying grid spacings becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidadaptation to grid spacing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The compression section is designed to be dynamically adjustable through compression and trimming operations. This allows the overall length of the filling element to be adapted to different grid spacings while maintaining the structural integrity of the base body, combining manufacturing simplicity with field adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If chamber filling elements are clamped or glued into the rail chamber without lateral road surface support, then installation flexibility is improved, but stability and load-bearing capacity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation flexibilityVSAvoidload-bearing capacity and stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The filling element uses a composite structure combining harder rubber-elastic material in the base body for strength and stability, with softer compressible material in the compression section. This composite approach maintains load-bearing capacity while allowing flexible installation methods including clamping and gluing without lateral road surface support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables easy adaptation to different grid spacings, simplifies installation, and reduces manufacturing complexity, ensuring stability and effective stray current insulation, with the added benefit of being easier to produce and install, while minimizing the risk of material degradation from water absorption.

Implementation Method 1

the rail chamber filling elements being somewhat compressed in the longitudinal direction, and at least predominantly only the compression section being compressed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

the base body is essentially compressed due to its much greater hardness retains its shape and length

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2706144B1Rail chamber filling element
Publication Date: 2016.04.06 HET ELASTOMERTECHN
  • EP2706144B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2706144B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP2706144B1 patent drawingFigure 6~8

AI summary

The rail chamber filling element (20) is provided with base portion (22) and compression section (24) that is made of harder elastic material and softer compressible material respectively. The filling element is extended longitudinally along longitudinal direction of rail (10) that is provided with rail head (12) and rail base (14). A connecting web (16) installed on both sides of rail to forms rail track. Independent claims are included for the following: (1) a rail chamber filling system; (2) a railway track; and (3) a method for building rail chamber filling element into rail.