Rail Vehicle Chassis Swivel Joint Load Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rail-bound transport vehicle chassis face challenges in navigating curves efficiently due to high loads on expensive angular contact ball bearings, which are necessary for transferring loads through swivel joints.

Innovation Solution

The chassis design incorporates a support bearing between the swivel joint and the roller, allowing part of the load to be transmitted via this bearing, reducing the load on the swivel joint and using a plain bearing with low friction sliding surfaces, such as metal and plastic, to facilitate smooth curvature navigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If angular contact ball bearings are used in the swivel joint to transfer loads, then the load transfer capability is improved, but the cost and complexity of the swivel joint increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload transfer capabilityVSAvoidswivel joint complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The load transfer function is segmented between two components: the swivel joint handles the pivoting motion while the support bearing handles the load transfer. This division allows each component to be simpler - the swivel joint no longer needs complex angular contact ball bearings since the support bearing carries the load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support bearing acts as an intermediary element between the chassis axle and the roller assembly. It mediates the load transfer from the vehicle body through the roller to the rail, allowing the swivel joint to focus solely on enabling the necessary pivoting motion without bearing the full load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If angular contact ball bearings are used in the swivel joint to transfer loads, then the load transfer capability is improved, but the cost of the chassis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload transfer capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the load transfer function to a dedicated support bearing, the expensive angular contact ball bearings are eliminated from the swivel joint. The support bearing can use simpler, less expensive bearing technology while still achieving the required load transfer capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support bearing provides a cost-effective solution by using simpler, cheaper bearing technology compared to angular contact ball bearings. While the individual support bearing may need replacement, the overall system cost is reduced due to the elimination of expensive angular contact ball bearings from the swivel joint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of operation

If a plain bearing with sliding surfaces is used in the support bearing, then the friction is reduced for curve navigation, but the load transfer capability must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurve navigation smoothnessVSAvoidload transfer capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The support bearing uses composite material pairing (metal and plastic sliding surfaces) to achieve both low friction for smooth curve navigation and sufficient load transfer capability. The metal surface provides structural strength while the plastic surface provides low friction characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces the need for expensive angular contact ball bearings and minimizes friction, enabling smoother and more efficient curve navigation while reducing the overall cost and complexity of the swivel joint.

Implementation Method 1

The plain bearing has two sliding surfaces that slide along one another when the pivot arm is pivoted. This way, the plain bearing can, on the one hand, transmit the forces generated by the load effectively. On the other hand, it allows the pivot arm and roller to pivot with as little friction as possible

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP4015341B1Running gear for a railway transport vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.05.22 FAIGLE KUNSTE
  • EP4015341B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP4015341B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP4015341B1 patent drawingFigure 7~10

AI summary

Chassis (1) for a rail-bound transport vehicle for transporting goods, in particular in intralogistics, wherein the chassis (1) has at least one chassis axle (2) and at least one load-bearing roller (3), wherein the roller (3) is rotatably mounted in a swivel arm (5) about a roller rotation axis (6) for rolling on a rail (4) and the swivel arm (5) together with the roller (3) is pivotably mounted on the chassis axle (2) by means of a pivot joint (7), wherein the swivel arm (5) is additionally supported on the chassis axle (2) by means of a support bearing (8) and the roller (3) is arranged between the pivot joint (7) and the support bearing (8).