Rail Surface Cleaning Nozzle Layout for Laminar Dirt Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing surface cleaning devices for rail vehicles face inefficiencies due to turbulent air mixing and swirls when cleaning complex topographies, leading to reduced cleaning power and incomplete removal of dirt particles from ballast stones.

Innovation Solution

A device with air nozzles arranged in rows on either side of an aspiration opening, where the pressure of the rear row is higher than the front row, creating a directed flow that collects and carries impurities, and an air guide element ensures a laminar air flow parallel to the surface, enhancing cleaning efficiency and power.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If compressed air nozzles are used to clean surfaces, then cleaning action is provided, but turbulent mixing of air reduces cleaning power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning powerVSAvoidturbulent mixing
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The air nozzle system is segmented into multiple nozzles arranged in specific patterns (e.g., alternating sides, different heights) to create separate, controlled air streams rather than a single turbulent flow. This segmentation allows each nozzle to contribute to a coordinated laminar flow pattern that maintains cleaning power while reducing turbulence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the air nozzle system are configured with different properties - nozzles on opposite sides may have different pressures, flow rates, or angles to create a balanced laminar flow. The local quality of each nozzle stream is optimized to contribute to the overall laminar flow pattern, with some nozzles providing higher velocity streams and others providing lower velocity streams to maintain flow stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If higher flow rate is used to improve cleaning efficiency, then more impurities are removed, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the flow rate and pressure of individual nozzles based on real-time feedback from sensors that detect soiling levels. This allows the system to maintain high cleaning efficiency when needed while reducing energy consumption during lighter cleaning tasks, optimizing the balance between productivity and energy use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cleaning system incorporates sensors that automatically detect the presence and amount of impurities, enabling the system to self-regulate its flow rate and energy consumption. The system adjusts its operation to match the actual cleaning needs, avoiding unnecessary energy expenditure while maintaining effective cleaning performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If compressed air jets impinge on complex topography, then surface cleaning is attempted, but swirls reduce cleaning effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface cleaning capabilityVSAvoidcleaning effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The air nozzle system utilizes multiple spatial dimensions by arranging nozzles at different heights, angles, and lateral positions. This multi-dimensional configuration allows the system to address complex surface topographies effectively, with nozzles positioned to target different elevation levels and surface features, maintaining cleaning effectiveness across varied terrain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of directing air jets perpendicular to the surface which creates swirls on complex topography, the system inverts the approach by directing air streams parallel to the surface at controlled angles. This inverted configuration reduces turbulence and swirl formation while maintaining adaptability to various surface geometries, preserving cleaning effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution increases cleaning efficiency by ensuring impurities are collected and carried along effectively, reducing the required flow rate and allowing for a larger cleaned surface area without turbulent mixing, thus improving the resilience of rail tracks and appearance of railway facilities.

Implementation Method 1

The rows of nozzles are supplied with compressed air such that the pressure of the row of air nozzles disposed in front of the aspiration opening in the direction of travel of the rail vehicle is lower than the pressure of the other row of air nozzles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompressed air flow: Jet

Implementation Method 2

an air guide element to ensure a laminar air flow parallel to the surface, enhancing cleaning efficiency and power

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaminar flow: Laminar Flow

Implementation Method 3

an aspirator opening and at least two air nozzles arranged in rows of air nozzles disposed on either side of the aspirator opening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentUS9089879B2Device and method for cleaning wall or ground surfaces
Publication Date: 2015.07.28 PLASSER ESPANOLA
  • US9089879B2 patent drawing
  • US9089879B2 patent drawing
  • US9089879B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for cleaning wall surfaces, ground surfaces, track superstructures or tunnel walls is configured to be arranged on a rail vehicle that moves along a direction of travel. The device includes an aspirator opening and at least two air nozzles arranged in rows of air nozzles disposed on either side of the aspirator opening such that the aspirator opening is disposed between the rows of air nozzles. The rows of air nozzles are supplied with compressed air such that the pressure of the row of air nozzles disposed in front of the aspiration opening in the direction of travel of the rail vehicle is lower than the pressure of the other row of air nozzles.