Rail Vehicle Coupling Device Series Control Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Freight trains face high risks of unintentional uncoupling due to the large number of coupling points, leading to potential damage and safety issues during frequent reassembly and operation, especially when driving down slopes, as existing technologies lack sufficient safety integrity to prevent unwanted decoupling.

Innovation Solution

A coupling device system that requires simultaneous decoupling signals from neighboring vehicles to initiate the uncoupling process, utilizing a series connection of switching devices and actuating components to ensure that multiple signals must be correctly activated before decoupling occurs, distributing safety responsibility across computing units and using existing train communication lines to minimize coupling contacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automatic coupling is implemented with multiple coupling points on freight trains, then coupling efficiency is improved, but the risk of unintentional uncoupling increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupling efficiencyVSAvoidsafety integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The coupling system is divided into multiple independent coupling points along the train, each with its own control unit. This segmentation allows automatic coupling at multiple locations simultaneously, improving productivity while maintaining independent control over each coupling point to prevent unintentional uncoupling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each coupling point is equipped with control units that continuously monitor the coupling state and receive feedback signals from the train controller. This feedback mechanism ensures that uncoupling operations are only executed when properly authorized, preventing unintentional decoupling while maintaining efficient automatic coupling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Extent of automation

If more coupling points are added to freight trains, then automation capability is improved, but the complexity of control lines increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic coupling capabilityVSAvoidcontrol line complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A universal control line system is implemented that can communicate with multiple coupling points along the train. This multi-functional control infrastructure allows a single command from the train controller to be distributed to all coupling points, enabling automatic coupling at multiple locations without proportionally increasing control line complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system transitions from point-to-point control lines to a distributed control architecture where control signals are transmitted through a central controller that manages multiple coupling points. This dimensional change in control architecture enables automation across multiple coupling points while simplifying the overall control line structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If uncoupling is performed manually, then safety control is improved, but operation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety controlVSAvoiduncoupling operation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The coupling system incorporates self-service automatic uncoupling functionality where the train controller automatically initiates and executes uncoupling operations at multiple coupling points. This eliminates the need for manual intervention while maintaining safety control through automated monitoring and execution, thereby reducing operation time without compromising safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical uncoupling operations are replaced with an automated electromechanical system controlled by the train controller. The system uses electrical signals to control the uncoupling mechanism, replacing manual mechanical operations with automated control while maintaining safety through integrated monitoring and control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4368473A1Safe uncoupling of rail vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.05.15 KNORR BREMSE SYST FUR SCHIENENFAHRZEUGE GMBH
  • EP4368473A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4368473A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4368473A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A coupling device (K) according to the invention comprises: an actuating device (1) adapted to move a locking device (2) into an unlocked or locked state; a computing unit (3) adapted to transmit an actuating signal to a first switching device (4); a first control connection (7) which can be connected to a complementary first control connection (7') of a further coupling device (K'), wherein the first control connection (7) is connected to a third switching device (6), wherein the actuating device (1), the first switching device (4) and the third switching device (6) are connected in series, wherein at least to start the unlocking of the coupling device (K) the transmission of an actuating signal to the first switching device (4) and the third switching device (6) is required.Therefore, it is necessary for two adjacent vehicles to receive uncoupling signals in order to trigger an uncoupling process at the common coupling point.