Rail Crossing Obstruction Detection via Automated Warning Bulletins

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to effectively detect obstructions at route crossings, leading to potential collisions between rail vehicles and other vehicles or objects, as warnings may be missed by personnel, resulting in inadequate braking or slowing to prevent accidents.

Innovation Solution

An obstruction detection system utilizing a wayside camera assembly to generate image data of track crossings, with a controller determining the presence of obstructions and communicating warning bulletins to rail vehicles equipped with positive train control systems to automatically apply brakes or change movement and avoid collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If radar systems are used to detect obstructions at crossings, then detection capability is provided, but warnings may be missed by personnel resulting in failure to prevent collisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision prevention reliabilityVSAvoidwarning information loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a controller as an intermediary between the radar detection system and the rail vehicle operators. The controller receives detection signals from the radar, processes the obstruction information, and automatically generates and transmits warning bulletins to approaching rail vehicles. This intermediary system ensures that detection information is reliably communicated without depending on human personnel to manually observe and relay warnings, thereby preventing information loss and improving collision prevention reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical warning system (where personnel visually monitor radar displays and manually communicate warnings) with an automated electronic communication system. The controller automatically transmits warning bulletins via communication devices to rail vehicles, substituting human intervention with an automated information transmission mechanism. This eliminates the risk of human error in warning delivery and ensures reliable collision prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual monitoring of radar warnings is used, then detection of obstructions is possible, but personnel may fail to respond in time to prevent collisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision prevention reliabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically detecting obstructions and transmitting warning bulletins to approaching rail vehicles before the rail vehicles reach the crossing. The controller continuously monitors for obstructions and proactively communicates warnings to vehicles in advance, allowing sufficient time for operators to respond and apply brakes. This eliminates the delayed response associated with manual monitoring and ensures timely collision prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the slow manual response process (where personnel must visually detect warnings, process the information, and communicate it to operators) with an automated electronic warning system. The controller automatically transmits warning bulletins directly to rail vehicles, eliminating human reaction time delays and ensuring immediate response to obstruction conditions, thereby improving both reliability and response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If automated warning systems are implemented, then collision prevention is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision prevention reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-functional controller that performs multiple tasks: it receives and processes radar detection signals, determines the presence of obstructions, calculates which rail vehicles are approaching the crossing, generates warning bulletins, and transmits warnings via communication devices. By consolidating these functions into a single controller, the system achieves high collision prevention reliability while minimizing the number of separate components, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the detection system, warning generation system, and communication system into an integrated automated warning system. The controller combines radar signal processing, obstruction determination logic, vehicle tracking, and warning transmission functions into a unified system. This merging reduces the number of separate devices and interfaces, simplifying system management and maintenance while maintaining high reliability for collision prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11358618B2Crossing obstruction detection system
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECH CORP
  • US11358618B2 patent drawing
  • US11358618B2 patent drawing
  • US11358618B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An obstruction detection system receives sensor data from sensor assemblies at different crossings of routes on which vehicles travel. The system determines whether an obstruction is present in one or more of the crossings based on the sensor data. The system wirelessly restricts movement of one or more vehicles responsive to determining that the obstruction is present by wirelessly communicating a notification signal to the one or more vehicles.