Rail-Mounted Depalletizing Robot with Door and Light Curtain Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current warehouse material handling processes, particularly depalletization, face inefficiencies and safety concerns due to manual labor, which can lead to ergonomic risks, human errors, and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an automated depalletization system featuring a robot that traverses multiple workstations, equipped with safety features like automatic doors, light curtains, and physical barriers, allowing for efficient and safe operation by minimizing human intervention and accommodating mixed pallets with differing item elevations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual labor is used for depalletization, then labor flexibility is maintained, but worker safety deteriorates due to ergonomic risks and human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworker safetyVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical labor with an automated robotic system equipped with an end effector that can grasp and manipulate pallets. The robot traverses along a rail system to access multiple workstations, eliminating direct human contact with heavy objects and reducing ergonomic risks while maintaining operational flexibility through programmable control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a robotic system as an intermediary between the pallet handling process and human workers. The robot acts as a mediator that performs dangerous manual tasks, allowing workers to remain in safe zones while still benefiting from flexible, adaptive depalletization operations through centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If a single workstation is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but productivity deteriorates due to robot downtime when issues occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepalletization throughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the depalletization system into multiple independent workstations (first, second, and third workstations) arranged along a rail. Each workstation can operate independently, allowing the robot to switch between stations when issues occur at any single location. This segmentation enables continuous productivity while isolating problems to specific zones rather than shutting down the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic workstation configuration where the robotic system can adaptively move between different workstations based on real-time conditions. The robot traverses along a rail system, dynamically selecting which workstation to service next, allowing the system to maintain optimal productivity by redirecting to functional stations when issues arise at others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If the robot operates continuously at one workstation, then task completion speed is improved, but safety deteriorates when workers need to access the workstation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepalletization speedVSAvoidsafety risk to workers
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the operational space into distinct workstations separated by physical barriers and safety zones. Workers can access specific workstations independently while the robot operates at others, allowing safe human-robot collaboration. The segmentation of space enables both high-speed automated operation and safe worker intervention when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the robotic system as an intermediary that can pause or relocate its operations to allow worker access to workstations. The robot acts as a controllable mediator that prioritizes safety by yielding to human workers when access is required, while maintaining efficient depalletization speed during periods when workstations are clear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If manual depalletization is used, then adaptability to mixed pallets is maintained, but productivity deteriorates due to slower processing speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitems processed per hourVSAvoidhandling mixed pallets
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a programmable robotic system that can dynamically adjust its operational parameters to handle different pallet configurations. The robot's end effector and control system can be reconfigured through software to accommodate varying pallet sizes, weights, and item arrangements, enabling high-speed processing while maintaining adaptability to mixed and variable pallet types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs a universal robotic depalletization system with a multi-functional end effector that can grasp and manipulate various types of items on different pallet configurations. The single robotic system serves multiple functions across different workstations and pallet types, achieving both high productivity and versatility through centralized, adaptable automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11738956B2Door and light curtain control system for depalletization systems and methods
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 TARGET BRANDS INC
  • US11738956B2 patent drawing
  • US11738956B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Warehouse automation and methods of handling materials can be used to enhance the safety and efficiencies of warehouse operations. For example, automation systems and methods that make depalletization processes safer and more efficient are described. In some examples, the depalletization systems described herein include multiple work cells/stations and a depalletization robot that traverses the work cells/stations on a rail so the robot can autonomously move between the stations.