Rail Vehicle Derailment Detection Beam

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting derailments or obstacles on rail vehicles are not robust enough against false triggering and require complex maintenance, especially in harsh environmental conditions, and often rely on specific vehicle and route properties.

Innovation Solution

A method and device using a transversely positioned beam above the rail, with sensors detecting deflections in vertical and axial directions to differentiate between derailments and obstacle impacts, allowing for simple and reliable detection without complex mathematical methods, and incorporating a spring mechanism to prevent false triggers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If inductive sensors or complex mathematical methods are used for derailment detection, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvederailment detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex electronic inductive sensors and mathematical integration methods with a simple mechanical beam system. The beam's vertical deflection directly indicates derailment, eliminating the need for complex signal processing and integration algorithms while maintaining reliable detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical beam is a simple, robust component that can be easily replaced if needed. Its straightforward design with no complex electronics or software makes it inherently maintainable and suitable for harsh railway environments where simplicity and replaceability are valued.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Device complexity

If simple mechanical detection methods are used, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability decreases due to false triggers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidfalse trigger resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The beam is equipped with directional sensors that distinguish between vertical deflection (derailment) and axial deflection (obstacle impact). This local differentiation capability allows the simple mechanical system to reliably distinguish between different event types, preventing false triggers while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical beam acts as an intermediary that translates complex derailment and obstacle events into simple, distinguishable deflection directions. By mediating between the physical event and the detection system, the beam provides reliable information with minimal processing required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If directional differentiation is implemented to distinguish derailment from obstacle impact, then information quality is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent differentiation capabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection function is segmented into two independent directional components: vertical deflection detection for derailment and axial deflection detection for obstacle impact. This segmentation allows each sensor to focus on a specific direction, simplifying the overall system while providing comprehensive event differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate differentiation between derailments and obstacle impacts, reducing false alarms and simplifying maintenance by using purely mechanical variables, allowing for independent horizontal and vertical movement detection and easy integration with vehicle control systems.

Implementation Method 1

the deflection of the beam from its rest position can be determined by means of sensors wherein if a deflection of the beam in the vertical direction with respect to the rail vehicle is detected, a derailment is concluded, and if a deflection of the beam in the axial direction with respect to the rail vehicle is detected, an impact of an obstacle is concluded

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3079965B1Method and device for detecting a derailment or a striking of an obstacle against a rail vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.02.05 SIEMENS MOBILITY AUSTRIA GMBH
  • EP3079965B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3079965B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3079965B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Method for detecting a derailment or a striking of an obstacle (7) against a rail vehicle (1), in which a bar (2) is arranged in front of the leading wheelset (3) in the direction of travel, transversely to the longitudinal axis of the rail vehicle (1), above the rail top edge (4) and such as to be movable in the vertical and axial direction relative to the rail vehicle (1), wherein the deflection of the bar out of its rest position can be ascertained by means of sensors (5, 6), and wherein a derailment is deduced upon detection of a deflection of the bar (2) in the vertical direction relative to the rail vehicle (1) and the striking of an obstacle (7) is deduced upon detection of a deflection of the bar (2) in the axial direction relative to the rail vehicle (1).