Rail Vehicle Diagnostic Software for Modular Maintenance Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods and systems for monitoring and diagnosing rail vehicle components lack flexibility and efficiency, particularly in adapting software for condition-based maintenance without disrupting operation or compromising safety.

Innovation Solution

A modular evaluation software structure that allows dynamic addition, deletion, or modification of software modules via a control center, enabling continuous adaptation and integration of new functions during operation, with communication between onboard units and a control center for predictive maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the evaluation software uses a fixed structure, then system stability is maintained, but adaptability to new maintenance requirements is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidsoftware structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation software is divided into independent, interchangeable modules that can be individually added, removed, or updated. Each module handles specific maintenance evaluation tasks, allowing the system to adapt to new requirements by simply adding or modifying individual modules rather than redesigning the entire software structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The software architecture transitions from a static, fixed structure to a dynamic, configurable structure where modules can be loaded and unloaded at runtime. This enables the system to dynamically adapt its functionality based on changing maintenance requirements while maintaining a stable core framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If software modules are added or modified during operation, then maintenance flexibility is improved, but system reliability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance flexibilityVSAvoidoperational reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Software modules are pre-validated and prepared before being deployed to the rail vehicle. The control center verifies module integrity and compatibility before transmission, ensuring that only reliable, tested modules are installed. This preliminary validation maintains system reliability while enabling flexible updates during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control center acts as an intermediary between module developers and the onboard evaluation system. It manages the secure transmission, validation, and installation of software modules, ensuring that updates are performed reliably without compromising operational safety or system stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive monitoring of all components is implemented, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system divides comprehensive component monitoring into specialized modules, each responsible for specific component types or diagnostic functions. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high diagnostic accuracy across all components while managing data processing complexity through modular organization and specialized handling of different data streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3194229B2Method for monitoring and diagnosing components of a rail vehicle by means of an extensible evaluation software
Publication Date: 2026.01.14 KNORR BREMSE SYST FUR SCHIENENFAHRZEUGE GMBH
  • EP3194229B2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3194229B2 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3194229B2 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for monitoring and diagnosing components (2, 4) of a rail vehicle, as a singular rail vehicle or as part of a rail vehicle train consisting of a plurality of rail vehicles, with regard to the necessary repair or maintenance, as appropriate, of at least one component (2, 4), in which at least one measuring device (6, 8) captures at least one measurement variable, which is relevant to an assessment of a necessary repair or maintenance, as appropriate, of the component (2, 4), an evaluation of the captured measurement variable with regard to a repair or maintenance of the affected component (2, 4), which is necessary immediately or in the future as appropriate, is carried out by an evaluation software implemented in an evaluation device (10, 12) arranged on board the rail vehicle or rail vehicle train, and, in the event that the evaluation device (10, 12) deems that it is necessary for a repair or maintenance of the corresponding component (2, 4) to be carried out immediately or in the future, a message (14, 16) in this respect is generated by the evaluation device (10, 12) and transmitted to a control center (28), which is located outside the rail vehicle (1) or outside the rail vehicle train. The invention is characterized by supplementation, extension, modification or adaptation of the evaluation software implemented in the evaluation device (10, 12) by means of instructions, data and/or software modules sent from the control center (28) to the evaluation device (10, 12).