Rail Grinder Pivoting Tool for 180-Degree Grinding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rail grinding machines with internal combustion engines are limited in their ability to maintain correct operation and longevity due to restricted angular ranges of inclination, leading to issues such as carburation and lubrication problems, especially when grinding at steep angles.

Innovation Solution

A rail grinder design where the grinding tool is pivotally mounted to rotate around a secant axis, allowing an angular range of at least 180°, while the motor remains non-pivoting and independent, enabling grinding of the entire rail profile with improved mobility and ergonomics, and maintaining the internal combustion engine's simplicity and economy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the motor is directly coupled to the grinding tool so that the output shaft of the engine is parallel to the axis of rotation of the grinding tool, then the structure is simple and economical, but the motor tilts with the grinding head when grinding in a tilted position, limiting the angular range to +/-30° and risking engine failure due to carburation and lubrication problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor coupling structureVSAvoidangular range of grinding tool
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into independent components: the motor remains fixed on the frame while the grinding tool is pivotally mounted, allowing them to move independently. This segmentation enables the grinding tool to achieve a wide angular range of motion without compromising motor operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A pivotal mounting mechanism acts as an intermediary between the motor and the grinding tool. This intermediary allows the grinding tool to pivot independently while still receiving rotational drive from the motor, resolving the conflict between structural simplicity and angular versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the grinding tool is limited to a restricted angular range of +/-30° to maintain motor operation, then the motor structure remains simple, but the machine cannot grind the entire rail profile including mushroom, web, and sides

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor operation stabilityVSAvoidgrinding coverage of rail profile
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The grinding tool is made dynamically movable through pivotal mounting, allowing it to adapt its angle independently of the motor. This dynamic capability enables the tool to reach various parts of the rail profile (mushroom, web, sides) while the motor remains stationary and stable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By separating the motor's fixed position from the grinding tool's movable position, the system achieves both stable motor operation and comprehensive grinding coverage. The pivotal connection allows the tool to access the entire rail profile without affecting motor stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If the motor follows the inclination of the tool, then the direct coupling architecture is maintained, but the engine risks failure in the event of steep inclination due to carburation and lubrication problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor-grinding tool couplingVSAvoidengine longevity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The motor and grinding tool are segmented into independent units with distinct functions. The motor remains fixed to avoid inclination-related failures, while the grinding tool pivots independently to perform grinding operations at various angles, eliminating the reliability issue while maintaining operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pivotal mounting serves as an intermediary that decouples the motor's rotational output from the grinding tool's angular position. This intermediary allows the tool to pivot without transmitting inclination forces to the motor, protecting the engine from carburation and lubrication problems while maintaining a relatively simple coupling architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient grinding of the entire rail profile, including mushroom, web, and sides, with enhanced mobility and longevity of the motor, allowing operation beyond +/- 90° inclination, while maintaining a simple and economical architecture suitable for switches and diverse track conditions.

Implementation Method 1

A rail grinder is a machine designed to grind the head of a rail, preventively or curatively. Usually, the rail grinding operations concern both the top of the rail head and the sides of the head oriented respectively towards the inside and the outside of the railway track.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

a motor (2) receiving an abrasive grinding tool (3) which it drives in rotation, the abrasive tool and the motor forming a grinding assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentEP3517682B1Rail grinder
Publication Date: 2020.10.07 GEISMAR ALPES
  • EP3517682B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3517682B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3517682B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The invention relates to a rail grinder configured to run on a railway or similar track, and comprising: - At least one internal combustion engine (2), - At least one grinding wheel (4a) driven in rotation about an axis of rotation (R2) by the engine (2), - A frame (5), characterized in that the grinding tool (3) is pivotally mounted on the frame (5) and configured to pivot about a first axis of rotation (R1) substantially intersecting and preferably perpendicular to the axis of rotation (R2) of the grinding wheel (4a) in an angular range of at least substantially 180°, while the engine (2) is mounted on the frame (5) in a non-pivoting manner and independently of the grinding tool (3).