Rail Position Verification Using External Electrical Switches

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for checking the correct rail position of guided vehicles are manual and prone to errors, relying on on-board hardware that increases maintenance costs and fault rates, and do not effectively monitor the presence or absence of a railhead on the guide rail.

Innovation Solution

An automatic electrical switch system with contactless or mechanical interaction capabilities, using sensors like optical, inductive, or ultrasonic sensors, or lever switches to detect the correct positioning of guide members on the rail, ensuring reliable and safe operation by switching states based on interaction with the guide members.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual checking methods are used to verify rail position, then operational simplicity is maintained, but reliability and safety are compromised due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverail position verification reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical checking with an automatic electrical switching system. Electrical switches detect the presence or absence of the railhead through contactless or mechanical interaction, automatically verifying rail position without human intervention. This substitution eliminates human error while maintaining system simplicity through standardized electrical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system performs self-verification by automatically detecting railhead presence and switching states based on guide member position. The system serves itself by continuously monitoring without requiring external manual checking, thereby improving reliability while keeping the device structure simple and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If on-board hardware is installed in guided vehicles to monitor rail position, then measurement precision is improved, but maintenance costs and fault rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverail position detection precisionVSAvoidmaintenance cost and fault rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of installing complex on-board sensing hardware in the guided vehicle, the patent inverts the approach by placing simple electrical switches on the external rail structure. The detection mechanism is moved from the vehicle to the infrastructure, significantly reducing vehicle complexity and maintenance requirements while maintaining precise detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the monitoring function from the guided vehicle itself and places it in the external rail system. By removing the need for on-board electronics and sensors in the vehicle, the system reduces maintenance costs and fault rates while preserving measurement precision through the external switch mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Device complexity

If mechanical contact switches are used to detect guide member position, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability decreases due to wear and contact failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitch system complexityVSAvoidswitch operation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary detection mechanism where the electrical switch detects the presence or absence of the railhead indirectly through the guide member's interaction with the rail. This intermediary approach allows the use of simpler mechanical or contactless switches without directly bearing the full mechanical load, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent offers the option of using contactless electrical switches (such as optical or inductive sensors) to replace traditional mechanical contact switches. This substitution eliminates wear and contact failure issues while keeping the overall system complexity low, thereby improving reliability without sacrificing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If the guide rail structure is modified to accommodate monitoring switches, then measurement capability is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguide member position detectionVSAvoidguide rail manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the electrical switch mechanism to serve multiple functions: it detects guide member position, verifies railhead presence, and can be integrated into existing rail structures without requiring complete redesign. This multi-functionality approach improves measurement capability while minimizing manufacturing complexity by leveraging universal mounting solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies only the local areas of the guide rail where switches need to be mounted, rather than redesigning the entire rail structure. By applying changes locally at specific monitoring points, the system achieves improved measurement precision while keeping the overall manufacturing process simple and compatible with existing rail infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides a reliable, cost-effective, and safe means to automatically check the correct rail position of guided vehicles, reducing maintenance costs and fault rates, and ensuring operational safety without the need for on-board electronics.

Implementation Method 1

detection means comprising at least one optical sensor able to detect the presence or the absence of the railhead on the guide rail by receiving light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection: Light

Implementation Method 2

detection means comprising at least one inductive sensor able to detect the presence or the absence of the railhead on the guide rail

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

detection means comprising at least one ultrasonic sensor able to detect the presence or the absence of the railhead on the guide rail

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic detection: Ultrasound

Data Source

PatentUS10647336B2Method and devices for checking the correct rail position of a guided vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.05.12 SIEMENS MOBILITY SAS
  • US10647336B2 patent drawing
  • US10647336B2 patent drawing
  • US10647336B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a system for checking the correct rail position of a guide member of a guided vehicle. The system is based on the use of an electrical switch designed to cooperate with a guide member of the vehicle guided by at least one guide rail. The switch has two states, respectively a first state and a second state. In one of the states the electrical switch is open and in the other state the electrical switch is closed. The switch is mounted on a load-bearing structure such that it is able to interact with the guide member. The switch is able to switch from the first state to the second state by interacting with at least one part of the guide member.