Rail Support Structures Aligned With Recoater Direction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As additive manufacturing processes are scaled up to accommodate larger parts, existing matrix support structures face challenges with lateral forces from the recoater arm, leading to potential deformation and failure due to uneven thermal dissipation and powder handling issues.

Innovation Solution

The use of support structures with substantially parallel vertical walls, oriented in the direction of the recoater arm, separated by unfused powder to minimize lateral forces and prevent deformation, along with specific scan patterns and beam widths to ensure stable object formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If matrix support structures are used to support overhanging portions, then support function is provided, but lateral forces from the recoater arm cause deformation and failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport structure stabilityVSAvoidresistance to lateral forces
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is divided into multiple discrete rails rather than a continuous matrix, allowing each rail to independently support the build while reducing lateral force transmission. The rails are spaced apart and separated by unfused powder, creating segmented support elements that are more resilient to recoater-induced deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure transitions from a two-dimensional matrix pattern to a three-dimensional arrangement of vertical rails extending through multiple layers. This dimensional change allows the rails to support overhanging portions while their vertical orientation parallel to the recoater direction minimizes exposure to lateral forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If support structures with vertical walls parallel to recoater direction are used, then lateral forces are minimized, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation preventionVSAvoidsupport structure geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The orientation parameter of the support structure is changed to align vertical walls parallel to the recoater direction. This parameter modification optimizes the structure's resistance to lateral forces while the simple geometric form (vertical walls) keeps manufacturing relatively straightforward despite the orientation constraint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If scan lines are used to form support structures, then material is deposited efficiently, but beam width must be precisely controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition efficiencyVSAvoidbeam width control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The scan lines used to form support structures are spaced apart rather than overlapping, with unfused powder left between adjacent rails. This partial action approach reduces the need for precise beam width control while maintaining efficient material deposition, as the gaps between scan lines are intentional and functional rather than errors to be avoided.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the likelihood of support structure deformation and object failure by aligning rails with the recoater direction, allowing the recoater to ride on top and minimizing lateral forces, resulting in more stable and successful large-scale additive manufacturing builds.

Implementation Method 1

a particular type of AM process uses an energy beam, for example, an electron beam or electromagnetic radiation such as a laser beam, to sinter or melt a powder material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser sintering: Selective Laser Sintering

Implementation Method 2

selective laser sintering, direct laser sintering, selective laser melting, and direct laser melting are common industry terms

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser melting: Laser Beam Welding

Implementation Method 3

spread evenly over a build plate using a recoater arm travelling in direction to maintain the powder at a level and remove excess powder material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical spreading:

Data Source

PatentUS11173668B2Methods and rail supports for additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2021.11.16 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US11173668B2 patent drawing
  • US11173668B2 patent drawing
  • US11173668B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure generally relates to methods for additive manufacturing (AM) that utilize rail support structures in the process of building objects, as well as novel rail support structures to be used within these AM processes. The rail support structures include a plurality of substantially parallel vertical walls, each wall extending substantially parallel to a direction from the first side to the second side. Adjacent walls of the plurality of substantially parallel vertical walls are separated by a portion of unfused powder. An object is formed above the plurality of substantially parallel vertical walls.