Rail Trolley Attachment Dynamics for Binding Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional trolleys for rails often bind and brake unexpectedly, leading to user injuries and stranding, especially when navigating curved sections, due to increased transverse forces, which also limits the ability to increase rail gradients for safety without compromising speed.

Innovation Solution

A trolley design featuring a frame with rotatable wheels and an attachment member that can shift between two angular displacements, reducing transverse forces on the rail by allowing the attachment point to move, thereby minimizing the likelihood of binding and braking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the rail gradient is increased to reduce braking due to binding, then trolley speed increases, but user safety deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrolley speedVSAvoiduser safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment member is made movable between first and second configurations, allowing it to dynamically adjust its position along the rail. This dynamic adjustment enables the trolley to maintain optimal engagement with the rail at different gradient angles, reducing binding while controlling speed to preserve user safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the angular parameter of the attachment member relative to the rail. By adjusting the angle at which the attachment member engages the rail between different configurations, the trolley can optimize its performance across varying gradient conditions without compromising safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If the attachment member is fixed to the frame, then device complexity is reduced, but trolley reliability deteriorates due to binding and braking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment member structureVSAvoidtrolley reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment member transitions from a fixed to a movable configuration, enabling it to adapt to varying rail conditions. This dynamic capability prevents binding and unexpected braking, significantly improving trolley reliability without requiring complex additional components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The attachment member is designed as a separate, movable component that can independently adjust its configuration. This segmentation allows the attachment function to be optimized independently from the main frame structure, improving reliability through targeted adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11059498B2Trolley
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 CASTREE PROJECTS LTD
  • US11059498B2 patent drawing
  • US11059498B2 patent drawing
  • US11059498B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A trolley 100 for a rail 10 is described. The trolley 100 comprises a frame 110, a set S of wheels 120, including a first wheel 120A and a second wheel 120B, rotatably coupled to the frame 110 and an attachment member 130, coupled to the frame 110, for suspension of a load W therefrom, in use. The first wheel 120A is rotatable in a first plane P1 about a first axis A1 and the second wheel 120B is rotatable in a second plane P2 about a second axis A2. The first plane P1 and the second plane P2 define a line L. The trolley 100 is arrangeable in a first configuration, wherein the attachment member 130 is arranged at a first angular displacement D1 about the line L. The trolley 100 is arrangeable in a second configuration, wherein the attachment member 130 is arranged at a second angular displacement D2 about the line L, wherein the first angular displacement D1 and the second angular displacement D2 are different. A rail assembly 1, including the trolley 100 and the rail 10, is also described.