Rail-Tuned Irrigation Emitter Pressure Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current drip irrigation emitters face challenges with pressure compensation, leading to pressure drops and debris accumulation, as they either have a large profile causing pressure loss or a low profile limiting pressure responsiveness and increasing the risk of plugging.

Innovation Solution

A continuous, in-line emitter with a pressure responsive section featuring rails and a floor, tuned by various elements such as rail distance, height, and feature density to deflect at desired differential pressures, allowing for a discharge exponent range of 0 to 0.7 and reducing debris accumulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If discrete pressure compensating emitters extend downward into the fluid passageway, then pressure compensation capability is improved, but pressure drop along the lateral increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure compensation capabilityVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The emitter transitions from a discrete in-line configuration to a lateral-mounted configuration, moving the pressure compensation mechanism from the vertical fluid passageway to the horizontal lateral wall. This dimensional change allows pressure compensation features to function effectively without extending into the main flow path, thereby maintaining system pressure while achieving reliable pressure compensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses molded features on the emitter body that replicate the pressure compensation functionality of traditional in-line emitters. These molded features create the necessary flow resistance and pressure regulation effects without requiring the emitter to physically extend into the fluid passageway, thus copying the functional benefits while avoiding the pressure loss drawback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If the regulating feature cross sectional area is greatly reduced to generate desired resistance at upper pressure range, then pressure compensation is improved, but debris accumulation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure compensationVSAvoiddebris accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The emitter incorporates multiple regulating features distributed along the lateral, with each feature having locally optimized cross-sectional characteristics. Rather than one minimal cross-section feature, the system uses several features with larger individual cross-sections that collectively provide the necessary flow resistance. This local quality variation prevents debris accumulation at any single point while maintaining pressure compensation across the operating range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure compensation function is divided into multiple segmented regulating features rather than a single feature. Each segment handles a portion of the flow resistance requirement, allowing each individual feature to maintain a larger cross-sectional area that resists debris buildup, while the collective arrangement achieves the desired pressure compensation effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of energy

If emitter profile is made lower to reduce line losses, then pressure drop is reduced, but working distance and pressure responsiveness are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveline lossesVSAvoidpressure responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure compensation features are positioned in the lateral dimension rather than extending vertically into the passageway. This allows the emitter to maintain a low profile that minimizes line losses while the lateral-mounted regulating features provide adequate working distance and pressure responsiveness through their arrangement along the lateral wall.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The emitter maintains consistent water delivery over long distances with reduced pressure loss and debris issues, enabling efficient irrigation by tuning features to respond to pressure changes effectively.

Implementation Method 1

an elastomeric strip bonded to the inner wall... The at least one feature is tuned by at least one tuning element to deflect at desired differential pressures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

pressure compensating emitters... pressure responsive section... deflect at desired differential pressures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS11452269B2Rail tuned pressure responsive irrigation emitter
Publication Date: 2022.09.27 THE TORO COMPANY
  • US11452269B2 patent drawing
  • US11452269B2 patent drawing
  • US11452269B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An emitter comprising a pressure responsive section and at least one feature defined by a floor, a first rail, and a second rail. The at least one feature being tuned by at least one of rail to rail distance, rail height, rail width, rail corner, vertical rail gap, transverse rail gap, external rail, floor thickness, floor profile, tip height, tip clearance, feature density, feature contour, feature angle, and feature thickness.