Railway Track Monitoring via Train-Borne Vibration Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current railway track inspection methods are ineffective for continuous monitoring, prone to subjective errors, costly, and unable to detect rail breaks in real-time, posing safety risks due to reliance on visual inspections and ultrasound controls that are not applicable in a continuous mode.

Innovation Solution

A railway track monitoring system that equips rails and trains with sensor units to record and correlate vibrations generated by trains, allowing for the detection of uncorrelated signals indicative of broken rails, which are then reported to the operation center, ensuring objective, automated, and cost-effective monitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If visual inspection or ultrasound control is used to inspect railway tracks, then some level of detection accuracy is achieved, but the inspection cannot be conducted in continuous mode and requires manual operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses passing trains themselves as the inspection platform, eliminating the need for separate inspection vehicles or manual inspectors. The sensor unit on the train automatically detects rail breaks through vibration analysis, making the inspection process self-service and fully automated

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection and ultrasound control with automated vibration sensors that measure mechanical vibrations caused by train wheels passing over the rails. This substitution enables continuous automated monitoring without human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Area of stationary object

If manual inspection procedures are implemented across the entire railway network, then comprehensive coverage is achieved, but the cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection coverage areaVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables continuous inspection by utilizing every passing train as an inspection platform. Instead of periodic manual inspections, the vibration sensors continuously monitor the rails whenever trains are in operation, achieving comprehensive coverage without time loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection system serves multiple functions: it monitors rail conditions, detects breaks, and utilizes the existing train traffic for inspection purposes. The same train infrastructure that transports passengers also performs the inspection function, eliminating the need for separate inspection resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If electric current circuits are used to detect broken rails, then break detection is achieved, but the system becomes incompatible with ERTMS and requires infrastructure investment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreak detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the electrical current circuit method with a mechanical vibration-based detection system. Sensors measure vibrations caused by wheel-rail interaction, which remains compatible with ERTMS and modern train control systems while maintaining break detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the detection parameter from electrical current flow to mechanical vibration frequency and amplitude. This parameter change maintains detection sensitivity while ensuring compatibility with modern train control systems that do not rely on continuous current circuits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides continuous, objective, and cost-effective monitoring, reducing the risk of rail breaks by detecting disruptions in real-time, enhancing safety and reducing the likelihood of derailments.

Implementation Method 1

sensor units for sensing acceleration of a rail of a track... vibrations or acoustic waves that are generated by the train and travelling in the rails

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

acoustic waves that are generated by the train and travelling in the rails with a wave propagation velocity Vwaves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic wave propagation: Sound

Data Source

PatentUS11447166B2Railway track condition monitoring system for detecting a partial or complete disruption of a rail of the railway track
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 WAVETRAIN SYST
  • US11447166B2 patent drawing
  • US11447166B2 patent drawing
  • US11447166B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A railway track condition monitoring system including a plurality of sensors installed on a rail of the track and spaced by a predetermined distance from each other. The sensors having respective signal acquisition and recording means for the acquisition and recording of an acoustic signal being generated by an approaching train and propagated by the rail or by a ground carrying the rail. A signal transfer means for the transfer of an acquired and recorded signal to the passing train by wireless transfer at the time of passing of the train in proximity to sensors, and a signal analyzing means for analysing transferred ones of the acquired and recorded signal on-board the passing train. The signal analyzing means may be adapted to compare in a processing unit the signals from adjacent sensors and on that basis indicate a rail discontinuity.