Rail Vehicle Control for Audible Warning Timing and Clear Crossings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle systems face inefficiencies and safety risks due to improper activation of warning sounds at crossings, blocking of intersections, and delays caused by trailing vehicles needing to stop frequently, which affects fuel economy and safety.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control system that automatically manages vehicle movement relative to other vehicles, crossings, and work zones by pacing, controlling audible warnings, and preventing intersection blocking, using onboard or off-board controllers to optimize travel and communication with signaling devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the trailing vehicle system travels too closely to the vehicle system ahead, then the total trip time is reduced and fuel economy is improved, but the trailing vehicle system may be required to slow to a stop for a designated duration to avoid or reduce a risk of an accident

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal trip timeVSAvoidaccident risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the distance between vehicle systems and automatically adjusts the trailing vehicle's speed and positioning. The controller receives data from location determining devices and communicates with signaling devices to maintain safe following distances while optimizing trip time, providing real-time feedback control to prevent both accidents and unnecessary stops

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The trailing vehicle system's controller autonomously manages its own positioning and speed adjustment without requiring manual intervention. The system self-regulates by comparing its location to the leading vehicle's position and automatically implementing speed changes to maintain optimal spacing, reducing the need for operator decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If the operator manually controls the warning sound activation, then the system is simpler and easier to operate, but the operator may make mistakes such as forgetting to activate the warning sound at the proper time or activating it when not warranted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual control simplicityVSAvoidwarning activation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The trip planning controller automatically activates and deactivates the audible warning device based on its own operational state and location data. The system monitors its approach to crossings and autonomously controls warning sound activation without requiring operator intervention, eliminating human error while maintaining system simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The controller continuously monitors its location relative to crossings using location determining devices and automatically adjusts warning sound activation accordingly. The system provides real-time feedback control, activating warnings only when approaching crossings and deactivating them in quiet zones, ensuring accurate and consistent operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If very long rail vehicle systems stop in a location that results in a leading end locomotive being ahead of the crossing, but one or more trailing locomotives or railcars disposed in the crossing, then the vehicle system can stop, but the crossing becomes blocked causing significant delays or safety risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle system stopping capabilityVSAvoidcrossing blockage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the vehicle train into segments and determines the location of each segment relative to crossings. By tracking individual locomotives and railcars separately, the controller can identify when trailing units are approaching crossings and prevent stops that would cause blockage, while still allowing the leading locomotive to position itself appropriately

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller proactively identifies potential crossing blockage situations before they occur by monitoring the positions of all vehicle segments. It takes preliminary action to prevent stops that would result in trailing units blocking crossings, adjusting speed and positioning in advance to maintain both stopping capability and crossing clearance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12420850B2Vehicle control system
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 TRANSPORTATION IP HOLDINGS LLC
  • US12420850B2 patent drawing
  • US12420850B2 patent drawing
  • US12420850B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method can include determining a location of a locating device disposed onboard a vehicle system, identify a size of the vehicle system, calculate a duration that the vehicle system has been blocking or will be blocking an intersection between at least two intersecting routes based at least in part on the location of the locating device and on the size of the multi-vehicle system, and implement one or more responsive actions to clear the intersection responsive to the calculation of the duration. Optionally, the system and method can predict or forecast whether a vehicle system approaching or moving through the intersection will come to a stop in a locking that blocks the intersection, and implement one or more responsive actions.