Rail Wheel Friction Testing via Controlled Axle Slip Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rail vehicle braking systems lack accurate and frequent determination of friction coefficients between wheels and rails, leading to excessive safety margins and reduced railway capacity due to infrequent and crude braking distance estimates.

Innovation Solution

A friction testing system for rail vehicles that uses a set of brake/traction units and a control unit to apply controlled forces to wheel axles, measuring wheel speed differences to determine friction coefficients, allowing frequent and reliable assessments without affecting passenger comfort or causing significant mechanical wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If frequent braking distance tests are performed to improve measurement accuracy of friction coefficients, then reliability of braking distance estimates is improved, but mechanical wear increases and passenger comfort deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction coefficient determination accuracyVSAvoidmechanical wear and passenger discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The braking system is segmented into multiple independently controllable brake units, each capable of being selectively activated. This allows the system to apply braking force to specific wheel axles rather than all axles simultaneously, reducing overall mechanical wear while maintaining sufficient braking force for accurate friction coefficient measurement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit dynamically adjusts the braking force applied by each brake unit based on real-time conditions. By gradually increasing brake force until wheel slip is detected, the system performs frequent measurements without always applying maximum braking force, thereby reducing mechanical wear and improving passenger comfort while maintaining measurement accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If safety margin is increased to ensure safe braking distance, then reliability of rail vehicle operation is improved, but productivity of railway system deteriorates due to reduced throughput capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking safetyVSAvoidrailway throughput capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously monitors wheel speed signals and compares them to detect wheel slip conditions. This feedback mechanism allows the system to dynamically adjust braking force based on actual friction conditions, providing reliable braking performance while minimizing the need for excessive safety margins, thereby increasing railway throughput capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If brake force is increased to improve braking performance, then reliability of emergency braking is improved, but mechanical wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency braking functionalityVSAvoidmechanical wear
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The braking system is divided into multiple independently controllable brake units distributed across different wheel axles. This segmentation allows the system to apply high brake force to specific axles when emergency braking is required, maintaining reliable emergency stopping capability while distributing and reducing overall mechanical wear compared to applying maximum force to all axles simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables dynamic adaptation of safety distances, increasing railway throughput capacity while maintaining safety by regularly updating friction assessments during both braking and acceleration.

Implementation Method 1

a first brake/traction unit in the set of brake/traction units is configured to apply a brake/traction force to a first wheel axle of the rail vehicle so as to cause retardation/acceleration of the rail vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

In response to the absolute difference exceeding the threshold value, the control unit is configured to determine a parameter reflecting a friction coefficient between the wheels and a set of rails upon which the rail vehicle travels

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction coefficient measurement through wheel slip detection: Friction Coefficient

Data Source

PatentEP4275985B1Friction testing system, computer-implemented friction-testing method for a rail vehicle, computer program and non-volatile data carrier
Publication Date: 2026.03.18 DELLNER BRAKES AB
  • EP4275985B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4275985B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP4275985B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

In a rail vehicle (100) a control unit (140) controls a set of brake/ traction units (101, 161; 102, 162; 103, 163; 104, 164) by control signals (B1, A1; B2, A2; B3, A3; B4, A4) to apply a respective brake/traction force to a respective wheel axle (131, 132, 133, 134 to cause retardation/acceleration of the rail vehicle (100). The control unit (140) obtains a first wheel speed signal (ω1) indicating a rotational speed of at least one first wheel (121), and obtains a second wheel speed signal (ωa) indicating an average rotational speed of at least one second wheel (122, 123, 124). The control unit (140) produces a first control signal (BF; A1) to the first brake/ traction unit (101, 161) such that this unit applies a gradually increasing brake/traction force to the first wheel axle (131) until an absolute difference (|ω1 - ωa|) between the first and second wheel speed signals (ω1; ωa) exceeds a threshold value. In response to the absolute difference (|ω1 - ωa|) exceeding the threshold value, the control unit (140) determines a parameter (µm) reflecting a friction coefficient (µe) between the wheels (121, 122, 123, 124) and a set of rails (181, 182) upon which the rail vehicle (100) travels.