Railing Picket with Cutouts for Horizontal Load Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional railing pickets often fail to meet horizontal load requirements, leading to excessive deflection or disengagement from the top or bottom rails, making them unsuitable for residential applications where homeowners install their own systems.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates elongated pickets with cutouts along their walls that engage spacers, which fit into grooves on the top and bottom rails, providing additional support and preventing disengagement under horizontal loads. The cutouts are strategically placed near the ends of the pickets and extend through the outer to the inner surfaces, enhancing the pickets' stability and engagement with the rails.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If conventional tubular pickets are used to save material, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but the pickets fail to meet horizontal load requirements and disengage from rails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial usageVSAvoidengagement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The picket is segmented into multiple walls (at least three walls forming a polyhedral structure) rather than a simple tubular shape. This segmentation creates multiple surfaces for potential cutout engagement points, distributing the load across multiple engagement points with the spacers, thereby improving reliability while maintaining material efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Cutouts are introduced as intermediary engagement features on the picket walls. These cutouts provide specific attachment points for the spacers, creating a mechanical interlocking system that enhances engagement reliability without requiring additional material. The cutouts act as mediators between the picket structure and the spacer components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Weight of moving object

If pickets are made lighter to reduce cost, then manufacturing cost decreases, but deflection exceeds allowable limits under code requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicket weightVSAvoidhorizontal load resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The picket design applies local quality by creating cutouts at specific locations on the walls rather than uniformly thickening the entire structure. This allows material to be strategically placed or removed based on functional requirements, maintaining strength at critical engagement points while keeping overall weight low. The cutouts are positioned to optimize the moment of inertia and load distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The picket forms a composite structural system when engaged with the spacers and rails through the cutouts. The combination of the picket body, cutout features, and spacer components creates a composite assembly that achieves higher strength-to-weight ratio than a solid picket would provide, meeting horizontal load requirements while maintaining lightweight construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Device complexity

If simple tubular pickets are used, then device complexity is reduced, but the pickets cannot withstand horizontal loads and disengage from rails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicket structure complexityVSAvoidhorizontal load capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The picket structure is segmented into multiple walls with cutouts, creating a polyhedral configuration. This segmentation increases the structural complexity slightly but provides multiple engagement surfaces for the spacers, significantly improving horizontal load capacity. The segmented design allows for better load distribution across multiple walls rather than concentrating stress on a simple tubular surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design transitions from a simple one-dimensional tubular form to a multi-dimensional polyhedral structure with cutouts. This dimensional change creates additional engagement surfaces and geometric complexity that enhance the picket's ability to resist horizontal loads through increased moment of inertia and distributed stress paths, while the cutouts add functional engagement points in a new spatial dimension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS9784011B2Railing system and picket for a railing system
Publication Date: 2017.10.10 PEAK INNOVATIONS INC
  • US9784011B2 patent drawing
  • US9784011B2 patent drawing
  • US9784011B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A picket for a railing system comprises an elongated body with one or more walls and first and second ends. The first and second ends engage the top and bottom rails, respectively, of the railing system. The picket also comprises one or more cutouts formed along one or more of the walls. Each of the cutouts engages one of the plurality of spacers. The cutouts are proximal to the first and second ends of the pickets.