Modular Railway Car Body Segmentation for Mass Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Rail vehicle manufacturers face challenges in meeting specific customer requirements for seat numbers and traction performance due to existing technologies, which often result in over-engineered vehicles with unnecessary mass and increased costs, and adjustments in seat capacity or drive power lead to compromises in comfort and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A modular construction method for rail vehicle cars using load-bearing structures of the same cross-section, allowing for varying car lengths by adding or removing window segments while maintaining the same strength design, enabling precise adaptation to customer needs without redesigning the vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the number of seats is increased to meet customer requirements, then the seating capacity is improved, but the vehicle mass increases leading to higher prices and worse driving dynamics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseating capacityVSAvoidvehicle mass
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The car body is divided into modular segments (base segment and window segments) that can be selectively combined. The base segment contains load-bearing structures and seating, while window segments can be added or removed to adjust length and seating capacity without redesigning the entire vehicle, thus avoiding unnecessary mass increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle configuration is made dynamic and adjustable through modular segments. Different combinations of base and window segments allow the vehicle to be adapted to various seating requirements, optimizing the mass-seating capacity ratio for each specific operational need rather than designing for maximum capacity in all cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Power

If the drive power is increased to meet traction performance requirements, then the acceleration capacity is improved, but the vehicle mass increases requiring compensation measures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction powerVSAvoidvehicle mass
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle is segmented into powered and unpowered carriages, allowing drive power to be concentrated in specific segments. This enables meeting traction requirements without increasing the mass of the entire vehicle fleet, as only certain segments carry the additional drive equipment mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Quantity of substance

If the number of cars is increased to adjust seat capacity, then the total seating capacity is improved, but the train length and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal seating capacityVSAvoidtrain configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each car is itself segmented into modular units (base and window segments), allowing capacity adjustment within individual cars rather than requiring additional cars. This reduces train complexity while achieving the same seating capacity adjustment goal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular segments are designed to be universal and interchangeable across different vehicle configurations. The same base and window segments can be combined in various ways to create vehicles with different seating capacities, making the system versatile without increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Quantity of substance

If the car body length is extended to accommodate more seats, then the seating capacity is improved, but the production cost and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseating capacityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The car body is segmented into standardized base and window segments that can be manufactured independently using the same load-bearing structures. This modular approach allows flexible length adjustment while maintaining consistent production processes and reducing manufacturing complexity compared to custom-building each vehicle length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle length and seating capacity are adjusted by changing the number of window segments added to the base segment, rather than redesigning the entire car body. This parameter-based adjustment maintains production efficiency while achieving capacity flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2543570B1Construction method for the layoutof a railway vehicle car, method for producing a railway vehicle car and rail vehicle car series
Publication Date: 2018.03.28 BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION GMBH
  • EP2543570B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP2543570B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C
  • EP2543570B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

The method involves providing maximum length of a rail vehicle wagon (100) and a seat divider (151), and constructing a vehicle body including bearing structures for the rail vehicle wagon, where the body has a base segment (110) that is designed for accommodating multiple rows of seats (120) corresponding to the seat divider. A required cross-section and design strength of the bearing structures are determined for the body. The rail vehicle wagon is constructed in different length variants while maintaining the cross-section and design strength of the body and the bearing structures. Independent claims are also included for the following: (1) a method for manufacturing a rail vehicle wagon (2) a rail vehicle family.