Railway Coupler Core Shifting and Torsional Rigidity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Railcar couplers face challenges with misformed structures due to core shifting during the manufacturing process, leading to defects such as incorrect wall thicknesses and premature failure, which are difficult to detect externally and can result in strain under torque and force loads.

Innovation Solution

A railcar coupler with a double I-beam configuration and reinforcing ribs, along with fixed core structures in the mold, to enhance torsional rigidity and stability, and reduce material thickness while maintaining or exceeding the strength of traditional couplers, and the use of austempered metals for improved durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If green sand casting method is used with removable patterns, then the mold can be assembled and disassembled easily, but core shift occurs during molten metal introduction leading to manufacturing defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold assembly easeVSAvoidwall thickness accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The mold is divided into cope and drag sections with removable patterns, allowing easy assembly and disassembly. This segmentation enables the mold to be opened after casting while maintaining precise core positioning through specialized core support structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Cores are positioned and secured in advance before molten metal introduction using core supports and positioning mechanisms. This preliminary action prevents core shift during the casting process, ensuring accurate wall thickness without compromising mold assembly ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If core structures are made removable for pattern extraction, then pattern removal is simplified, but core positioning stability deteriorates during casting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern removal easeVSAvoidcore position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The pattern is segmented into removable components that can be extracted separately, simplifying pattern removal. Simultaneously, core positioning structures remain integrated with the mold sections to maintain stability during casting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Core supports act as intermediary structures between the removable patterns and the fixed mold sections. These supports maintain core positioning stability during casting while allowing patterns to be removed easily after the casting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If traditional coupler design is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but torsional rigidity and force handling capability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupler structure complexityVSAvoidtorsional rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The coupler transitions from a solid cross-section to a hollow box section with internal ribs. This dimensional change reduces material usage while significantly improving torsional rigidity and force handling capability through the distributed structural geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The coupler employs a composite structure combining hollow box sections with internal reinforcing ribs. This composite geometry provides enhanced strength-to-weight ratio and improved torsional rigidity compared to traditional solid designs, while maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Loss of substance

If wall thickness is reduced to minimize material usage, then weight and material cost decrease, but structural strength and durability are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial usageVSAvoidcoupler durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The coupler uses a hollow box section with internal ribs instead of solid walls. This dimensional transformation allows reduced material thickness while maintaining structural integrity through the three-dimensional load-distributing geometry of the box section and rib reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The wall structure is segmented into multiple thin walls forming a box section with internal ribs. This segmentation distributes structural loads across multiple surfaces, compensating for reduced individual wall thickness and maintaining overall durability with reduced material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10994754B2Coupler for a railway vehicle, cores and method for production
Publication Date: 2021.05.04 PENNSY CORP
  • US10994754B2 patent drawing
  • US10994754B2 patent drawing
  • US10994754B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A coupler having a support provided through the body of the coupler and a plurality of openings in the coupler which are configured as open cavities. The coupler structure includes a shank that has a vertical support as well as lateral support. The coupler may be configured with a double I-beam structure with openings into the shank. Cores that may be fixed to the mold may be used to form the coupler and produce the openings in the shank.