Railway Image Monitoring for Predictive Grade Crossing Risk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current railway monitoring systems rely on reactive and empirical data, lacking effective use of artificial intelligence to analyze large volumes of video data for predictive analysis, which is computationally intensive and inefficient in preventing trespassing-related casualties and traffic delays at grade crossings.

Innovation Solution

Implementing machine learning-enhanced systems that utilize image sensing devices and neural networks to analyze railway conditions, including object recognition and prediction models, to generate real-time alerts and recommendations for improving safety and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If machine learning techniques are used to analyze large volumes of video data for predictive analysis, then predictive capability and safety monitoring accuracy are improved, but computation resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive capabilityVSAvoidcomputation resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the video data analysis process by analyzing individual image frames rather than processing complete video streams, dividing the computational task into discrete frame-based units that can be processed more efficiently. This segmentation allows predictive analysis to be performed on manageable data portions while maintaining overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary object detection and classification on individual frames before conducting comprehensive predictive analysis. By pre-identifying objects and their locations in advance, the system reduces the computational burden during the main predictive analysis phase, thereby lowering overall computation resource requirements while maintaining predictive capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If reactive monitoring based on empirical data is used, then system complexity is reduced, but safety and operational efficiency are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model enables the system to automatically detect, classify, and predict railway conditions without requiring complex manual analysis procedures. The system self-services by autonomously processing video data, identifying objects, and generating predictions, thereby maintaining simplicity while significantly improving safety through data-driven insights.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/empirical monitoring approaches with automated machine learning-based analysis. Instead of relying on manual inspection or simple empirical rules, the system uses neural networks and computational models to automatically assess railway conditions, enhancing safety without proportionally increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Quantity of substance

If limited historical accident data is used for analysis, then data processing requirements are reduced, but the accuracy and effectiveness of safety predictions are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata volumeVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from analyzing only historical accident data to processing real-time video data from multiple dimensions (multiple camera angles, continuous video streams, spatial and temporal information). This dimensional expansion allows the system to achieve high prediction accuracy using current operational data rather than relying solely on limited historical records.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously processes video data from imaging devices to maintain an ongoing understanding of railway conditions. This continuous analysis provides a steady stream of predictive information, replacing the intermittent and limited nature of historical data with continuous real-time data that enhances prediction accuracy and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20260062039A1Systems and methods for machine learning enhanced railway condition monitoring, assessment and prediction
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV
  • US20260062039A1 patent drawing
  • US20260062039A1 patent drawing
  • US20260062039A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods enable automated intelligent railway monitoring using railway image data from an imaging device. The railway image data includes image frames produced by the imaging device. A railway object recognition model is used to identify objects within the image frames and a railway condition is determined based on the object. A location and time associated with the railway condition are determined based on railway image data. Railway metrics are generated based on the railway condition and historical railway conditions. A railway condition prediction model is used to predict future railway conditions affecting an operating condition, an operating demand or both based on the railway metrics. An operating recommendation is determined to address the future railway condition and an alert is generated to with an indication of railway condition, the operating recommendation or both.