Railway Mowing System With Segmented Cutting Bar

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mechanized mowing devices for railways are inadequate for fine weeding, as they struggle to simultaneously manage the inter-rail area and side areas, and are prone to cutting tool breakage due to irregular ballast surfaces and obstacles.

Innovation Solution

A robotic mowing system with a transverse main bar equipped with motorized cutting elements and obstacle detection means, allowing for adjustable cutting height and simultaneous weeding of inter-rail and side areas, while minimizing the risk of cutting tool breakage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed-height mowing bar is used for inter-rail zone, then the cutting height is stable, but the system cannot adapt to irregular ballast surfaces and obstacles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to irregular surfacesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mowing bar is divided into multiple independent cutting units, each capable of individual height adjustment. This segmentation allows each unit to adapt to local surface variations while maintaining overall system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting units are made movable relative to the main bar, enabling dynamic height adjustment in response to detected obstacles and surface irregularities. This transforms a static system into a dynamic one that can adapt to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the mowing bar is lifted entirely to avoid obstacles, then cutting tool breakage is prevented, but productivity decreases due to lengthy maneuvers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting tool durabilityVSAvoidmowing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the mowing bar into independent cutting units, only the specific unit encountering an obstacle needs to be lifted or retracted, rather than the entire bar. This localized response maintains tool durability while minimizing interruption to the mowing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors act as intermediaries between the cutting units and the control system, detecting obstacles and triggering selective retraction of only the affected cutting unit, enabling rapid response without full system shutdown.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If manual clearing is used for railway tracks, then fine weeding is achieved, but the process is long and tedious

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweeding precisionVSAvoidmaintenance speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system performs mowing operations autonomously using sensors to detect obstacles and control units to adjust cutting heights, eliminating the need for manual intervention while maintaining fine weeding capability through precise, controlled movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters such as cutting height and unit retraction based on real-time sensor feedback, enabling automated fine weeding that adapts to varying track conditions without manual adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If chemical clearing is used for dense vegetation, then rapid treatment is achieved, but ecological and logistical disadvantages arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevegetation treatment speedVSAvoidecological impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces chemical clearing methods with a mechanical robotic mowing system that uses sensors and controlled cutting units to mechanically remove vegetation, achieving rapid treatment without the ecological harm associated with chemical applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4534759A1Robotic mowing system for the vegetation of a railway track, maintenance vehicle and associated method
Publication Date: 2025.04.09 SN SNCF
  • EP4534759A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4534759A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4534759A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention relates to a robotic mowing system for vegetation present on a railway track having rails arranged on a railway surface, said track having a central zone extending between the rails and two lateral zones arranged on either side of the rails along said central zone, said system comprising at least one main bar; means for detecting the railway surface and obstacles present on the railway track; a plurality of cutting elements each mounted movable in translation relative to said main bar and a control unit configured to adjust the cutting height of each cutting element according to the railway surface and obstacles present on the railway track, the invention also relates to a maintenance vehicle equipped with such a system and an associated method.