Railway Vehicle With Overlapping Robot Arms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing railway maintenance and construction technologies face challenges in efficiently and reliably mounting railway components like balises and axle counters, especially in outdoor or uncontrolled environments, due to the need for powerful, mobile, and robotizable work devices that can perform various operations with high precision and low energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

A railway vehicle equipped with two or more vertically articulated robot arms, each with its own work tool, mounted close enough to overlap in their work area, allowing simultaneous access to the same location on the track structure. This configuration enables the vehicle to perform tasks such as mounting railway components with high precision and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single robot arm is used for mounting railway components, then the device structure is simple, but the work efficiency and precision are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework efficiencyVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The work device is segmented into multiple independent robot arms (typically three), each capable of performing specific tasks such as holding components, drilling, screwing, or welding. This segmentation allows parallel execution of multiple operations, significantly improving productivity while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple robot arms are merged into a single integrated work device mounted on one railway vehicle. The arms share common mounting structures, control systems, and power supplies, allowing them to cooperate on complex mounting tasks while avoiding the complexity of multiple separate vehicles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Manufacturing precision

If more robot arms are added to increase work capability, then the mounting precision and efficiency improve, but the weight and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting precisionVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Each robot arm is equipped with interchangeable end effectors (grippers, drills, screwdrivers, welders) that can be adapted to different mounting tasks. This multi-functionality allows precise performance of various operations with standardized hardware, improving mounting precision without proportionally increasing overall system weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The robot arms use electric drive systems with variable speed and torque control, allowing optimization of power consumption based on task requirements. Precise positioning is achieved through controlled motor parameters rather than mechanical over-engineering, reducing weight while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If multiple robot arms are used to perform various operations simultaneously, then the work performance increases, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework performanceVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The robot arms operate in coordinated sequences with periodic cycles of movement, work execution, and return to starting positions. This periodic operation allows for energy recovery during deceleration phases and optimizes power consumption by avoiding continuous operation, maintaining high productivity while reducing overall energy usage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple robot arms perform different operations simultaneously and continuously on different components or different stages of the same component installation. This continuous parallel operation maximizes productivity by eliminating idle time, while the coordinated control optimizes energy consumption by synchronizing operations to avoid peak demand conflicts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Adaptability or versatility

If the robot arms are mounted close to each other to share work space, then the versatility for various applications improves, but the structural complexity and interference risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication versatilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot arms are arranged in a three-dimensional configuration around the work area, with bases mounted at different positions and heights on the vehicle structure. This spatial arrangement in multiple dimensions allows each arm to access different angles and positions of railway components, providing versatility for various applications while minimizing structural interference through careful dimensional planning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP4545705A1Track work with the help of two or three robotic arms
Publication Date: 2025.04.30 STRUKTON RAIL NEDERLAND BV
  • EP4545705A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4545705A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4545705A1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Railway vehicle for carrying out work on a section of a railway, the work may relate to maintenance or new construction, the rail vehicle comprises a chassis frame equipped with flanged rollers for driving over the two parallel rails of a railway, the rail vehicle delimits an internal work space, preferably open towards the bottom, which is equipped with a work device for working on the track structure, for example under the rail vehicle, for example for mounting an axle counter or a balise.