Railway Pilot Car Lower Fairing Width for Drag Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-speed rail vehicles face significant challenges in reducing aerodynamic drag, particularly in relation to the number of passengers transported, which increases energy consumption and traction power requirements.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a pilot car with a wider lower front fairing to deflect air, side skirts to cover the bogie, an inclined windshield for optimal aerodynamics and vision, a pantograph fairing to minimize air resistance, and peripheral flaps at the junction with adjacent trailer cars to reduce air influx, ensuring a seamless shape transition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If the pilot car uses a conventional fairing design, then the structure is simple, but the aerodynamic drag is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidfairing structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fairing is divided into multiple functional segments: upper fairing, lower fairing, side skirts, and front fairing with specific inclination. Each segment is optimized independently to control airflow in different zones, reducing overall drag while maintaining manageable structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lower part of the front fairing extends beyond the bogie width in the transverse direction, creating a three-dimensional airflow control structure. This dimensional extension allows the fairing to effectively deflect air away from the bogie housing, reducing drag without requiring excessive longitudinal or vertical complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Use of energy by moving object

If air is allowed to flow freely into the bogie housing, then the structure is open and simple, but the drag forces on the bogie and cavity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidfairing structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lower fairing has a width greater than the bogie width specifically at its lower part, creating a localized airflow control zone. This local geometric modification effectively limits air intrusion into the bogie housing without requiring the entire fairing structure to be complex or oversized

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The lower fairing acts as an intermediary structure between the external airflow and the bogie housing. It mediates the airflow by deflecting it before it can directly enter the housing, reducing drag forces on the bogie and cavity while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If the railway vehicle is designed for high speed, then the travel performance is improved, but the aerodynamic forces increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle speedVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The front fairing is inclined at 28° relative to the horizontal plane, creating a streamlined, curved surface that smoothly guides airflow over the vehicle. This curvature optimization reduces flow separation and turbulence, allowing high-speed travel with reduced aerodynamic drag and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The fairing geometry parameters are specifically optimized: the front fairing inclination angle is set to 28°, and the lower fairing width is made greater than the bogie width. These parameter changes create optimal airflow characteristics for high-speed operation, reducing drag forces that would otherwise increase with the square of velocity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration results in a 20.7% reduction in energy consumption due to air resistance, achieving a specific aerodynamic drag level of 6.08 × 10^-4 N/(km/h)^2 per unit, outperforming current high-speed trains.

Implementation Method 1

reduces the drag forces of the bogie and the cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag: Drag

Implementation Method 2

limit the air rushing into the bogie housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir flow deflection: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 3

reduces the drag forces of the bogie and the cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic resistance: Drag

Implementation Method 4

The pilot car has a front windscreen inclined at 28° relative to a horizontal plane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic flow optimization: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 5

These features all further improve the drag of the pilot car and the first trailer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag reduction: Drag

Data Source

PatentEP3312070B1Control trailer of a railway vehicle, especially of a high-speed railway vehicle, having reduced aerodynamic drag
Publication Date: 2020.12.09 ALSTOM TRANSPORT TECH SAS
  • EP3312070B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3

AI summary

The driving trailer (10) of the railway vehicle includes at least one housing (14) for a bogie (15), and a front fairing (22) comprising a lower portion (24) disposed in front of the housing (14) in a longitudinal direction (X). Said lower portion (24) has a width, in a transverse direction (Y), greater than the width of the bogie (15) in that same transverse direction (Y).