Railway Traction Assembly Pivot Offset for Loading Length

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current railway wagons with articulated structures are expensive to manufacture, require frequent maintenance, and cannot transport containers above the articulation, while one-piece wagons fail to meet kinematic gauge and discharge conditions in small radius curves, limiting their ability to carry multiple containers efficiently and cost-effectively.

Innovation Solution

A one-piece railway wagon design featuring a traction assembly with a damper assembly and a pivot-connected traction hook, where the pivot connection is offset relative to the damping direction, allowing for a longer traction hook without increasing the cantilever length, and a chassis with inclined stretchers to accommodate multiple containers while maintaining kinematic gauge and compliance in small radius curves.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If the pivot connection is located at the end of the damper assembly, then the traction hook length is maximized, but the cantilever length increases which violates kinematic gauge constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction hook lengthVSAvoidcantilever length
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The pivot connection is positioned beyond the second portion of the damper assembly in the longitudinal direction, utilizing the longitudinal dimension rather than extending the cantilever laterally. This dimensional repositioning allows the traction hook to achieve greater effective length for container transport while maintaining compliance with kinematic gauge constraints by keeping the cantilever length within acceptable limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Length of moving object

If an articulated structure is used to increase useful loading length, then multiple containers can be transported, but manufacturing cost and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuseful loading lengthVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The wagon body is divided into multiple loading sections along the longitudinal axis, separated by vertical bulkheads. This segmentation allows the transport of multiple containers (20 or 40 feet) on a one-piece wagon without requiring an articulated structure. The segmented design maintains structural integrity while enabling flexible container arrangement, avoiding the high manufacturing costs and maintenance requirements of articulated wagons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If the pivot connection axis is aligned with the damping direction, then the structure is simplified, but the traction hook cannot extend beyond the damper assembly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidtraction hook length
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The pivot connection axis is positioned perpendicular to the damping direction of the damper assembly, creating an asymmetric configuration. This asymmetric arrangement allows the traction hook to extend beyond the second portion of the damper assembly in the longitudinal direction, achieving the required length for multiple container transport while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure. The perpendicular orientation optimizes both structural efficiency and functional performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enables a longer useful loading length, reduced manufacturing costs, and improved maintenance efficiency, allowing for the transport of multiple containers (20 or 40 feet) while maintaining kinematic gauge and compliance in small radius curves, thus enhancing operational flexibility and safety standards.

Implementation Method 1

a damper assembly comprising a first portion intended in particular to be integral with a rail vehicle chassis, and a second portion, the second portion being configured to move in a direction of damping relative to the first portion when the damper assembly is subjected to a force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Implementation Method 2

a traction hook mounted, by a pivot connection, integral in translation along the damping direction with the second portion of the damper assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPivot connection: Hinge

Data Source

PatentEP3275761B1Traction assembly for railway coupling and railway vehicle including such an assembly
Publication Date: 2020.12.30 MILLET A F R
  • EP3275761B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3275761B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The present invention relates to a traction assembly (1) for a railway coupling, comprising: - a shock absorber assembly (4) having a first portion (18) intended, in particular, to be fixed to a railway vehicle chassis, and a second portion (20), the second portion being configured to move in a damping direction relative to the first portion (18) when the shock absorber assembly (4) is subjected to a force, and - a traction hook (2) mounted, by means of a pivot joint (10), fixed in translation along the damping direction with the second portion (20) of the shock absorber assembly (4). Depending on the damping direction, the pivot joint (10) is located between the first portion (18) and the second portion (20) of the shock absorber assembly (4) or beyond the second portion (20) of the shock absorber assembly. The invention also relates to a railway coupling and a railway vehicle comprising such a traction assembly (1).