Railway Traffic Graph Validation for Timetable Consistency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing traffic control systems for guided vehicles on railway networks are unable to efficiently and automatically manage changes to timetables, leading to potential inconsistencies and errors that can disrupt the smooth operation of guided vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a directed graph algorithm to automatically detect and correct inconsistencies in timetables by reversing directed edges in a cycle, ensuring consistent scheduling and routing of guided vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a timetable is manually changed to accommodate delays or issues, then the timetable can be adapted to current conditions, but errors or mistakes in manual changes can have serious consequences on traffic consistency and safety

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetimetable adaptabilityVSAvoidtraffic consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-validation by automatically detecting inconsistencies in the timetable itself without requiring external manual verification. The algorithm analyzes the timetable structure to identify conflicts, enabling the system to self-correct errors before they impact traffic operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides immediate feedback about timetable inconsistencies to operators through clear error messages and visual indicators. This feedback mechanism allows operators to understand and correct issues quickly, preventing erroneous timetables from being implemented and maintaining traffic consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If traditional traffic control systems recalculate timetables by applying delays to guided vehicles, then consistency is maintained, but the system cannot efficiently or automatically manage timetable changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetimetable consistencyVSAvoidtimetable management efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes of timetable verification with an automated computer-based algorithm. The system uses electronic data processing to automatically detect inconsistencies, eliminating the need for manual checking and significantly improving timetable management efficiency while maintaining consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The algorithm acts as an intermediary between timetable creation and implementation. It automatically analyzes the timetable structure, detects potential conflicts, and prevents erroneous timetables from being applied, serving as a protective layer that maintains consistency without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the system uses a directed graph algorithm to automatically detect inconsistencies, then timetable errors can be prevented before implementation, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror preventionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the timetable verification process into distinct algorithmic steps: constructing the directed graph from timetable data, analyzing graph properties to detect inconsistencies, and generating error reports. This segmentation makes the complex verification process manageable and implementable through structured computer algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4613607A1Method and system for managing traffic of guided vehicles over a railway network
Publication Date: 2025.09.10 SIEMENS MOBILITY SAS
  • EP4613607A1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP4613607A1 patent drawingFigure 4
  • EP4613607A1 patent drawingFigure 5A~5B

AI summary

The present invention concerns a traffic control system (110) and a method (200) for managing traffic of guided vehicles (103) over a railway network, said method comprising: - acquiring (201) a timetable for said guided vehicles (103); - acquiring (202) a map of said railway network; - using said map of the railway network for automatically dividing/splitting (203) the railway network into a set of successive track sections delimited by boundary positions (A-M); - for each boundary position (A-M), automatically determining (204) a list of the guided vehicles (103) crossing said boundary position (A-M); - automatically creating (206), from the map, the timetable, the boundary positions (A-M) and their associated list, a directed graph comprising nodes (401) and directed edges (402), wherein each node (401) represents an itinerary followed by one of said guided vehicles (103), and wherein each directed edge (402) is configured for connecting two of said nodes (401); - using (207) the directed graph as input to an algorithm configured for automatically detecting whether said directed graph comprises one or several cycles; and - if no cycle is detected (208) by the algorithm, then managing the traffic of said guided vehicles (103) according to said timetable.