Railway Traffic Management System with Pre-Execution Command Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current railway traffic management systems lack integration and coordination among components, leading to inefficiencies and safety concerns, particularly when handling multiple operations and varying network architectures, and there is a need for a scalable, reliable, and cost-effective solution.

Innovation Solution

A traffic management system that includes a communication interface, storage device, human machine interface, and elaboration device for pre-execution validation and post-execution confirmation of command instructions, ensuring compliance with operational conditions and safety standards, and allowing for flexible scheduling and immediate execution of validated intervention plans.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional railway traffic management systems are used, then basic traffic control functions are provided, but safety risks increase and operational efficiency decreases when handling multiple operations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of command batches before execution by checking consistency with railway operation rules and constraints. This pre-execution safety check prevents unsafe operations from being executed, thereby improving safety without compromising operational efficiency since validation occurs in advance rather than during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to operators about the safety status of command batches through the human-machine interface. This feedback mechanism allows operators to review safety validation results and make informed decisions, improving both safety awareness and operational efficiency by avoiding execution of unsafe commands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If comprehensive safety validation is performed for all command instructions, then safety is improved, but system complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments command validation into discrete batches rather than validating individual commands separately. By grouping related commands into batches and validating them collectively against operation rules, the system reduces overall complexity while maintaining comprehensive safety coverage across multiple operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The elaboration device performs multiple functions including command batch validation, safety checking, and execution control within a single integrated component. This multi-functionality approach consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate systems, thereby improving safety without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If batch command validation is implemented, then safety is improved, but execution time may be delayed due to pre-execution checking

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidexecution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs safety validation in advance before command execution is required. By completing the time-consuming validation process beforehand, the actual execution phase can proceed quickly without safety checks delaying real-time operations, thus improving safety while minimizing execution time delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation process operates continuously in the background, preparing command batches for future execution. This continuous validation approach ensures that when commands need to be executed, they are already validated and ready, eliminating delays between command generation and execution while maintaining safety standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP3696048B1System and method for traffic management of railway networks
Publication Date: 2021.06.23 ALSTOM FERROVIARIA SPA
  • EP3696048B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3696048B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3696048B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A traffic management system (100) for a railway network (200), comprising a communication interface (1) in operative communication with field devices (201) of the railway network (200), a storage device (5), a human machine interface (10) for interfacing with one or more operators, and a system (20) for monitoring and controlling the railway network (200). The monitoring and controlling system (20) is configured to generate one or more batches of command instructions suitable to be issued for execution the field devices (201). The system further comprises an elaboration device (30) configured, upon generation by the monitoring and controlling system of a batch of command instructions, to carry out a safety procedure for evaluating a response of the railway network in relation to the generated batch of command instructions, and to output to the human machine interface (10), for the one or more operators, information indicative of the results of the safety procedure carried out. There is also provided a related method for traffic management of a railway network.