Railway Network Security System with Virtual Signal Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current safety systems for track networks fail to optimize the sequence of vehicles and their routes, leading to inefficient use and stress on route elements, as they lack a method to dynamically manage vehicle allocations and signal states effectively.

Innovation Solution

The system specifies signals for each vehicle requesting route elements, designating them as virtual main or target signals based on danger points, allowing for optimized braking curves and route management through a communication system that allocates and confirms vehicle permissions and markings across route elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If current safety systems are used for track networks, then basic safety functions are maintained, but vehicle sequence and route optimization is insufficient leading to inefficient use of route elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle sequence optimizationVSAvoidsignal specification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by specifying signals in advance for each vehicle before the vehicle actually reaches the track section. The control center determines and communicates the type, position, and state of signals (virtual main signals at danger points and virtual target signals at non-danger points) ahead of time, allowing vehicles to plan their braking curves and routes optimally without reactive delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamics by making signal specifications adaptive and vehicle-specific. Each vehicle receives customized signal information based on its particular route, position, and operational characteristics. The signal states and positions are dynamically determined rather than static, enabling optimized braking curves (gently sloping for main signals, steeply sloping for target signals) tailored to each vehicle's needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If dynamic signal specification is implemented for each vehicle, then route optimization and conflict prevention improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconflict preventionVSAvoidcommunication and allocation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control center serves as an intermediary that manages the complex signal specification and allocation processes. It receives vehicle position and route information, determines appropriate signal configurations, and communicates allocations back to vehicles. This centralized intermediary handles the computational complexity of conflict prevention and route optimization, shielding individual vehicles from system complexity while maintaining high reliability through coordinated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where vehicles report their positions and route requests to the control center, which then specifies signal states and positions based on this information. The control center continuously monitors vehicle movements and adjusts signal allocations accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that prevents conflicts through real-time information exchange and adaptive signal management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If virtual main signals and target signals are specified at braking target points, then braking curve optimization is achieved, but information processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking curve optimizationVSAvoidsignal type, position and state data
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing customized signal information specifically tailored to each vehicle's local context and requirements. Each vehicle receives signal specifications (type, position, state) that are locally optimized for its particular braking scenario, whether it needs a gently sloping braking curve for a virtual main signal at a danger point or a steeply sloping curve for a virtual target signal. This localized information approach minimizes unnecessary data transmission while maximizing braking optimization effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3331744B1Security method and security system for a railway network
Publication Date: 2021.09.01 SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH
  • EP3331744B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP3331744B1 patent drawingFigure 1b
  • EP3331744B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The invention relates to a security method for a railway network which is divided into track sections (G1, G2,..., Gq) by track elements (S1, S2,..., Sp), and which can be travelled by vehicles (Z1, Z2,..., Zr), wherein the vehicles (Z1, Z2,..., Zr) request steps (B, R, M) for assignment as travel path elements from selections of the track elements. According to the invention, in order to optimise the train service, each (Si, where i = 1 to p) of the selected track elements provides at least one signal (HS; ZS) for each vehicle (Zm, where m = 1 to r) that requests at least one of the steps (B, R, M) for assignment as a travel path element from same. The invention also relates to a security system for a railway network.