Raise Boring Head Guide Blocks Debris Transport

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional raise boring heads face issues with debris accumulation around roller cutters, leading to reduced cutting efficiency and uneven wear, necessitating premature replacement of cutters due to differential stress and localized debris accumulation.

Innovation Solution

A raise boring head design featuring guide blocks that project from the mount face with transverse guide surfaces to facilitate the rearward transport of cut material, preventing debris accumulation and promoting uniform cutter wear by directing cuttings away from the cutting face through open channels or inclined/curved surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If a conical mounting face is used to prevent debris buildup, then debris accumulation is reduced, but differential cutter wear occurs and inner cutters are subject to greater stresses requiring premature replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris accumulationVSAvoidcutter wear uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting face is segmented into multiple independent guide blocks rather than using a continuous conical surface. Each guide block can be independently positioned and adjusted, allowing optimization of debris flow paths while maintaining uniform cutter engagement with the rock face at different radial positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each guide block is configured with specific local geometry and orientation tailored to its position on the mounting face. This allows each region to have optimized debris transport characteristics while maintaining uniform cutter performance across the entire face.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If roller cutters are distributed over a mount face, then cutting coverage is improved, but localized debris accumulation occurs between and around cutters reducing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting coverageVSAvoidlocalized debris accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Guide blocks are introduced as intermediary elements between the roller cutters and the mounting face. These guide blocks actively mediate debris transport by providing dedicated flow paths that channel cuttings away from the cutting zone, preventing accumulation between and around the distributed cutters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The solution adds a new dimensional aspect to debris management by incorporating guide blocks that extend in the axial direction from the mounting face. This creates three-dimensional debris flow paths that redirect cuttings rearward and away from the cutting face, rather than relying solely on radial or tangential flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If guide blocks are made integral with saddles, then manufacturing is simplified, but adjustability for different rock types and orientations is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguide block integrationVSAvoidpositioning adjustability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The guide blocks are segmented as separate components from the saddles, allowing independent positioning and adjustment. This segmentation enables optimization of guide block placement for different rock types and orientations while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through modular assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The guide blocks are designed with adjustable positioning capabilities, allowing their location and orientation to be dynamically modified according to specific rock conditions. This dynamic adaptability enables the same boring head to be optimized for different geological scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances cutting efficiency and extends the service life of roller cutters by effectively removing debris, reducing wear and the need for premature replacements, while allowing for adjustable positioning to suit different rock types and orientations.

Implementation Method 1

the guide block having at least one guide face aligned transverse to the mount face to facilitate the transport of cut material away from the mount face

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

The raise boring head includes replaceable roller cutters distributed over a mount face of the head that act to disintegrate the rock as they rotate independently

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical abrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS11028649B2Raise boring head for rotary boring
Publication Date: 2021.06.08 SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AB
  • US11028649B2 patent drawing
  • US11028649B2 patent drawing
  • US11028649B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A raise boring head for rotary boring in rock having a main body mountable at a drive shaft in which a mount face provides a supporting surface for a plurality of saddles that mount, in turn, respective roller cutters. At least one guide block is attached to the main body to project upwardly from the mount face and includes at least one guide face to facilitate the transport of cut material away from the mount face.