Rotary Rake Frame Suspension with Elastomeric Shock Absorbers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural implements like rotary rakes and tedders lack suspension during operation, leading to improper tine engagement with the ground, and existing suspension systems are inadequate for transport configurations, causing weight distribution issues and mechanical stress.

Innovation Solution

A suspension mechanism using elastomeric shock absorbing members within a tubular member, which provides minimal suspension during operation and maximizes suspension during transport by compressing under weight, with a torsional spring force and end cap to control rotation, ensuring durable, low-maintenance, and effective operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If no suspension is provided for the frame, then the structure remains simple and robust for crop engagement, but the tines cannot properly track along the ground surface during operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetine engagement reliabilityVSAvoidsuspension system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a dynamic suspension approach where the degree of suspension varies between operating and transport configurations. During operation, the frame is positioned to minimize suspension action for rigid crop engagement, while during transport, the frame is positioned to maximize suspension for comfort and stability. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by providing suspension only when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the suspension parameter (frame position relative to axles) between two states: a first position during operation providing minimal suspension, and a second position during transport providing maximum suspension. This parameter change allows the system to maintain simplicity during operation while providing suspension during transport, resolving the reliability-complexity contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If suspension is provided during operation, then the frame can absorb ground impacts, but the individual rotor units will bounce relative to the ground and fail to properly engage the crop

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe shock absorptionVSAvoidcrop engagement effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension system is made dynamic by adjusting the frame position between operation and transport configurations. During operation, the frame is positioned to minimize suspension action, ensuring rigid crop engagement. During transport, the frame is positioned to maximize suspension for shock absorption. This dynamic control resolves the contradiction between shock absorption and crop engagement effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the suspension function from the crop engagement function. The suspension system is designed to affect the overall frame stability without directly interfering with the rotor units' ability to engage the crop. This segmentation allows the frame to absorb shocks during transport while maintaining rigid engagement during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Area of stationary object

If the implement is placed in transport configuration with folded rotors, then the transport width is reduced, but a substantial amount of weight is placed on the inboard transport wheels causing mechanical stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport widthVSAvoidwheel load stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamic frame positioning system that adjusts the relative position between the frame and axles based on whether the implement is in operation or transport configuration. During transport, the frame is positioned to distribute weight more evenly across all transport wheels, reducing stress on inboard wheels while maintaining compact transport width.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the geometric parameter of frame position relative to the axles when transitioning between configurations. This parameter change optimizes weight distribution during transport, reducing the harmful concentration of load on inboard wheels while maintaining the reduced transport width necessary for mobility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If a rigid frame connection is used, then the structure is simple and strong, but the implement cannot adapt to ground variations during transport

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe connection simplicityVSAvoidground adaptation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a dynamic connection between the frame and axles that provides rigidity during operation for simple, strong crop engagement, but allows movement during transport for ground adaptation. This dynamic characteristic resolves the contradiction by providing the appropriate degree of rigidity or flexibility based on the operational state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The suspension system applies localized flexibility at specific points in the frame-axle connection while maintaining overall structural rigidity. This local quality allows the implement to adapt to ground variations during transport without compromising the overall structural strength and simplicity needed for operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mechanism allows for optimal tine engagement during operation while providing maximum suspension during transport, reducing mechanical stress and weight distribution issues, ensuring efficient crop handling and transportation.

Implementation Method 1

elastomeric shock absorbing members which provide a torsional spring force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

provide a torsional spring force with the movement of the wheel assemblies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorsional spring force: Torsion Spring

Data Source

PatentUS10470372B2Frame suspension for rotary rakes and tedders
Publication Date: 2019.11.12 PEQUEA MACHINE
  • US10470372B2 patent drawing
  • US10470372B2 patent drawing
  • US10470372B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A suspension mechanism for a rotary rake implement incorporates elastomeric shock absorbing members in the corners of a tubular member situated in between the corners of a square rod formed as part of the wheel assembly and received within the tubular member such that the corners of the square rod assert a pre-load spring force on the tubular member when the implement is in an extended operating configuration. The movement of the implement into a folded transport configuration with the weight of the implement supported on the transport wheel assemblies causes a deflection of the square rod that compresses the elastomeric shock absorbing members within the corners of the tubular member to provide maximum suspension for the implement when in transport, while providing minimum suspension when the implement is in operation. An end cap on the square rod engages a stop formed on the tubular member to control rotation.