Raman Spectroscopy for Non-Invasive Cell State Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating cell state, such as flow cytometry and quantitative RT-PCR, are invasive and difficult to apply for monitoring cells in real-time, especially in cell culture environments where sterility is a concern, and existing non-invasive methods like monitoring culture supernatants are limited in their ability to assess cell differentiation states effectively.

Innovation Solution

A Raman spectroscopic evaluation system that analyzes extracellular vesicles in the culture supernatant to determine the state of cells, including pluripotent stem cells, dopamine neural progenitor cells, and Ectoderm cells, using specific wavelength ranges and an evaluation model trained on Raman spectrum data to assess differentiation stages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If flow cytometry or quantitative RT-PCR is used to evaluate cell state, then measurement precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to invasive cell collection requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell state evaluation accuracyVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses culture supernatant as an intermediary medium to indirectly evaluate cell state. Instead of directly analyzing cells through invasive collection methods, the system analyzes biomolecules (proteins, metabolites, extracellular vesicles) present in the culture supernatant, which reflect the cell's physiological state. This intermediary approach maintains cell viability while providing accurate evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical cell collection and processing steps with optical detection methods. Raman spectroscopy and other non-invasive detection techniques directly analyze the culture supernatant or cells in situ, eliminating the need for cell harvesting, fixation, and preparation steps required by flow cytometry and RT-PCR.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If cell collection methods are used for evaluation, then measurement precision is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to difficulty in applying to monitoring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous monitoring by analyzing culture supernatant without interrupting cell culture. The system can repeatedly sample and analyze the same culture system over time, providing continuous data on cell state changes. This continuous action allows real-time monitoring and tracking of differentiation processes, unlike discrete cell collection methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

By using culture supernatant as an intermediary that contains biomolecular signatures of cell state, the system achieves both precise measurement and reliable monitoring. The supernatant serves as a stable, accessible sample source that reflects cell physiology without requiring cell disruption, enabling repeated measurements on the same cell population.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If existing non-invasive methods monitoring culture supernatant are used, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates in assessing cell differentiation states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-invasive monitoring capabilityVSAvoiddifferentiation state assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex analysis of culture supernatant into specific biomolecular components relevant to cell differentiation. Instead of attempting to analyze all components simultaneously, the system focuses on specific proteins, metabolites, or extracellular vesicle markers that are indicative of differentiation states, thereby improving measurement precision while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs multiple detection parameters and wavelengths in Raman spectroscopy and other analytical methods to capture different aspects of biomolecular composition in the culture supernatant. By analyzing multiple parameters simultaneously (e.g., different Raman shift regions, multiple biomarker concentrations), the system achieves high differentiation state assessment accuracy while maintaining non-invasive operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230272330A1Evaluation system and evaluation method
Publication Date: 2023.08.31 HITACHI LTD
  • US20230272330A1 patent drawing
  • US20230272330A1 patent drawing
  • US20230272330A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a novel evaluation system and an evaluation method for evaluating a state of cells. The evaluation system includes: a Raman spectroscopic device configured to perform Raman spectroscopic analysis on extracellular vesicles contained in a culture supernatant of the cells; and an analysis device configured to evaluate the state of the cells based on a Raman spectrum obtained by the Raman spectroscopic analysis.