Ramped Putting Device Feedback on Ball Momentum and Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Putting in golf is challenging due to the need for precise line and speed control, mental pressure, difficulties with ball position, green reading, and mechanical thoughts that can hinder performance.

Innovation Solution

A ramped device with a flat area at the top, designed to mimic a golf hole, allows golfers to practice putting by aiming to enter the ramp without hitting the sides and reaching the flat area, providing feedback on striking force and alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a golfer practices putting on a flat surface only, then the practice is simple and easy to set up, but it does not prepare the golfer for non-level putting surfaces encountered on actual golf courses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to putt on non-level surfacesVSAvoidcomplexity of practice device
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The practice device is segmented into multiple ramp sections with different inclines (e.g., 2%, 4%, 6% grades) that can be individually selected or combined. Each ramp segment represents a different putting condition, allowing golfers to practice on various non-level surfaces without requiring a single complex device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The ramp sections are designed to be adjustable and reconfigurable, allowing the golfer to dynamically change the putting surface conditions during practice sessions. The ramps can be positioned at different angles and configurations to simulate various on-course putting scenarios, making the device adaptable to different practice needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If a golfer focuses on precise line and speed control during putting, then putting accuracy improves, but the mental pressure and difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of line and speed controlVSAvoidease of putting execution
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device incorporates visual feedback mechanisms such as colored indicators or target zones that show whether the putt had the correct line and speed. This immediate feedback helps golfers adjust their putting technique without the overwhelming pressure of unknown outcomes, making precise control more achievable and less stressful.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The ramp sections are pre-configured with specific inclines and lengths that correspond to standard putting distances and break conditions. This preliminary setup eliminates the need for golfers to calculate complex line and speed parameters during pressure situations, as the physical device has already encoded the correct putting parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If a golfer thinks about multiple mechanical aspects of the putting stroke, then technical understanding improves, but performance is hindered by over-analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention of mechanical putting knowledgeVSAvoidputting performance under pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The device is designed to be self-instructive, with built-in visual cues and physical feedback that guide the golfer's technique without requiring conscious analysis of mechanical parameters. The ramp geometry itself teaches the correct putting mechanics through physical interaction, allowing the golfer to internalize proper technique without over-thinking during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The device replaces complex mechanical analysis with simplified physical interaction. Instead of requiring the golfer to mentally calculate line, speed, break, and surface conditions, the physical ramp structure embodies these parameters, allowing the golfer to rely on feel and intuition rather than mechanical computation during actual putting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device helps golfers improve their putting skills by providing feedback on ideal striking force and alignment, allowing for practice in various conditions, including non-level surfaces, and promoting mental and emotional clarity during gameplay.

Implementation Method 1

a ramp that receives initial contact with an oncoming putted and rolling golf ball and that allows the ball to naturally roll upward

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS20250144499A1Putting Practice Device
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 ZACHARY TERRANCE
  • US20250144499A1 patent drawing
  • US20250144499A1 patent drawing
  • US20250144499A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for supporting improvement in golf putting is provided. The system comprises a raised flat surface. The system also comprises a ramp with an upper edge approaching and attached to a front edge of the flat surface. The ramp receives initial contact with a putted golf ball at a lower edge of the ramp, the ball putted from a surface area approaching the lower edge. After the received initial contact, the system allows the ball to roll upward toward the upper edge. When the rolling ball has a first quantity of momentum, the system allows the ball to roll past the upper edge and onto the raised flat surface. In another event, when the rolling ball has a second quantity of momentum, the system allows the ball to discontinue rolling prior to reaching the upper edge and allows the ball to roll down the ramp to the ground surface.