RAN Agent Coordination Using Value Functions to Avoid Conflicts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In mobile cellular networks, multiple agents with conflicting intents and actions, such as self-organizing network (SON) agents, core network agents, and network slicing agents, often lead to uncoordinated network conflicts that violate service-level agreements (SLAs) and increase network load, making it difficult to manage and configure cells due to their operation by different vendors and departments.

Innovation Solution

A decentralized or centralized coordination mechanism using edge value functions and optimization algorithms that allow agents to select actions that are locally optimal while minimizing conflicts, involving the use of value functions and message passing algorithms to determine joint actions across agents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If multiple agents independently optimize network parameters to reduce energy consumption, then energy efficiency improves, but network conflicts increase and service-level agreements are violated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidservice-level agreement compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a coordination mechanism that acts as an intermediary between multiple autonomous agents. This mediator collects intent information from agents, detects conflicts using value functions, and resolves them through coordinated decision-making, allowing energy optimization while preventing SLA violations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where agents continuously report their intended actions and received coordination decisions. The coordination mechanism uses value functions to evaluate the impact of agent actions on network KPIs and adjusts decisions accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that balances energy efficiency with reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If agents from different vendors and departments operate independently, then system autonomy and adaptability improve, but coordination difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveagent autonomyVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal coordination mechanism that can handle multiple types of agents from different vendors and domains through a standardized interface. The value function framework provides a common language for expressing agent intents and evaluating conflicts, enabling heterogeneous agents to coordinate without increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If agents modify network parameters aggressively to improve performance, then optimization speed increases, but network stability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization speedVSAvoidnetwork stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The coordination mechanism allows agents to propose aggressive optimization actions but applies partial modification through conflict resolution. The value function evaluation determines the appropriate level of parameter adjustment, preventing excessive changes that would destabilize the network while still achieving performance improvement through coordinated incremental adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260006461A1Method and system to coordinate agents and avoid conflicts
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20260006461A1 patent drawing
  • US20260006461A1 patent drawing
  • US20260006461A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for coordinating nodes in a radio access network to optimize radio network operations. The method includes obtaining a topology of a plurality of network nodes in the radio access network. The method includes obtaining, for each network node of the plurality of network nodes, a plurality of potential actions each network node can perform in the radio access network to optimize one or more radio network operations. The method includes obtaining, for each network node of the plurality of network nodes, an optimization function. The method includes determining an action from the plurality of potential actions for a first network node of the plurality of network nodes to perform based on the plurality of potential actions and an optimization function.