RAN Aggregation Traffic Routing for Cellular Wi-Fi Interworking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently routing data traffic between cellular networks and Wi-Fi networks, leading to suboptimal user experience due to overloading in Wi-Fi networks, and lack of control over traffic distribution between wide-area and local-area networks.

Innovation Solution

Implementing Radio Access Network (RAN) aggregation techniques that allow base stations to dynamically route data traffic between 3GPP and non-3GPP networks like LTE and Wi-Fi, using RAN rules and non-access stratum messages to steer bearers based on channel conditions, loading, and backhaul quality, enabling simultaneous or exclusive use of WWAN and WLAN for different data flows.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If traffic is offloaded to Wi-Fi network, then network capacity is increased, but Wi-Fi network becomes overloaded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork capacityVSAvoidnetwork performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic traffic routing that continuously monitors network conditions (congestion levels, signal quality, backhaul availability) and adjusts bearer activation/deactivation in real-time. The system transitions from static traffic assignment to dynamic adaptation based on current network state, resolving the contradiction by preventing Wi-Fi overload while maximizing capacity utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters including bearer activation status, traffic routing decisions, and network selection based on monitored conditions. By dynamically adjusting these parameters rather than maintaining fixed configurations, the system optimizes network capacity utilization while preventing overload conditions that would degrade performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If RAN aggregation is implemented, then traffic routing control is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic routing controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces intermediary entities including a traffic routing function and core network elements that coordinate between RAN and core network. These intermediaries manage the complexity of RAN aggregation by providing standardized interfaces and centralized control logic, thereby improving traffic routing control without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments traffic control into separate functional components: bearer management at RAN level, traffic routing decisions at core network level, and bearer activation/deactivation coordinated between them. This segmentation allows each component to focus on specific tasks, improving overall control capability while managing complexity through functional decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If bearers are dynamically activated and deactivated, then traffic distribution is optimized, but connection stability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic distribution efficiencyVSAvoidconnection stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements prior cushioning by maintaining pre-configured bearers in a dormant but ready state. When traffic needs to be routed, these pre-prepared bearers can be quickly activated without complete re-establishment, thus optimizing traffic distribution while minimizing disruption to connection stability. The system cushions against the instability that would result from frequent bearer reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Adaptability or versatility

If multi-mode terminal is used, then network versatility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork versatilityVSAvoidterminal complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality by designing the terminal with multi-mode capability to operate across different network types (WWAN, WLAN, Wi-Fi). This multi-functionality allows a single device to adapt to various network conditions and access technologies, improving network versatility while the patent's coordinated management mechanisms help control the associated complexity through standardized interfaces and centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9674733B2Interworking link layer traffic aggregation with system level mobility
Publication Date: 2017.06.06 QUALCOMM INC
  • US9674733B2 patent drawing
  • US9674733B2 patent drawing
  • US9674733B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for routing data bearers of a user equipment (UE) while the UE is associated to a base station (BS) of a first radio access technology (RAT) while being served by a BS of a second RAT.