RAN Parameter Tuning Using Edge Device Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for optimizing radio access networks (RANs) are inefficient and costly due to repetitive testing and require expertise, making it difficult to optimize performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a computing device that uses a trained classifier model to classify edge devices and adjust operational parameters for radio networks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If comprehensive testing approaches are used to optimize RAN performance, then optimization accuracy is improved, but time consumption and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital twin (virtual copy) of the RAN that replicates the physical network's behavior and characteristics. This digital twin can be tested and optimized without affecting the actual network, allowing comprehensive optimization analysis to be performed on the copy while the physical network remains operational and unaffected by testing disruptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary optimization actions by first testing and validating parameter adjustments in the digital twin environment before applying them to the physical RAN. This preliminary action in the virtual model ensures that optimization accuracy is achieved through thorough testing while preventing time loss from failed field experiments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive testing approaches are used to optimize RAN performance, then optimization accuracy is improved, but cost increases due to specialized equipment and personnel requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization accuracyVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By creating a virtual digital twin of the RAN, the patent eliminates the need for expensive specialized testing equipment and highly paid expert personnel that would otherwise be required for comprehensive physical network testing. The digital twin can be created and manipulated using standard computing resources, dramatically reducing the cost of achieving high optimization accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical and physical testing system (requiring specialized equipment and manual expert operation) with a computational simulation system. The digital twin uses software-based models and algorithms to replicate network behavior, substituting expensive physical testing infrastructure with more affordable computational resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If traditional RAN optimization methods are used, then performance improvements can be achieved, but the process becomes complex and requires expert knowledge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance improvementVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The digital twin system enables self-service optimization where the virtual model automatically tests, evaluates, and determines optimal parameter configurations without requiring external expert intervention. The system serves itself by using its own simulated environment to identify improvements, reducing the complexity burden on human operators while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the digital twin simulates parameter changes, automatically measures performance outcomes, and uses this feedback to guide further optimization iterations. This automated feedback mechanism simplifies the optimization process by eliminating the need for experts to manually analyze complex interactions and determine next steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If repetitive testing is performed to optimize RAN, then optimization thoroughness is improved, but efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization thoroughnessVSAvoidefficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By performing all repetitive testing iterations in the digital twin copy rather than the physical network, the patent achieves thorough optimization validation without the efficiency penalties of repeated physical deployments. Multiple testing iterations in the virtual environment take minimal time compared to equivalent physical testing, maintaining both thoroughness and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The digital twin allows continuous optimization testing and validation to occur without interruption to normal RAN operations. While the physical network continues its useful action of serving customers, the digital twin simultaneously performs exhaustive repetitive testing, eliminating the need to stop network operations for testing purposes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20260006465A1Radio access network optimization based on edge device classification
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 BOOST SUBSCRIBERCO LLC
  • US20260006465A1 patent drawing
  • US20260006465A1 patent drawing
  • US20260006465A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing device, method, and computer readable media that provide radio access network improvements or optimization. A data port of a computing device receives communication data wirelessly communicated between wireless devices and a node in a telecommunications infrastructure, and receives a batch of operational parameters for the node. A processor in communication with the data port provides the communication data to a trained model configured to classify devices. The processor further obtains, from the trained model when the processor applies the communication data to the trained model, a classification for each of the wireless devices including a device type and a mobility state for each of the wireless devices. The processor further generates, based on the classifications, an adjustment for the batch of operational parameters.