RAN Software Upgrade Timing Using Traffic-Aware Analytics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 5G network software upgrades require manual intervention and can disrupt network availability due to the need for minimal traffic conditions, straining telecom operators and causing service disruptions.

Innovation Solution

Implement a machine learning model integrated with a cloud management system to predict an optimal timestamp for software upgrades of virtual network elements based on traffic conditions, generating a bearer information analytical report to facilitate automatic upgrades with minimal impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual intervention is used for software upgrades, then upgrade timing can be controlled, but operational complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice continuityVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines optimal upgrade timing by analyzing traffic patterns and performance metrics without human intervention. The network element itself generates upgrade requests based on predefined criteria, eliminating the need for manual monitoring and decision-making while maintaining service continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors traffic conditions, service quality, and network performance, using this feedback to automatically determine when upgrade conditions are met. This closed-loop approach replaces manual intervention with automated decision-making based on real-time network state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If software upgrades are performed during high-traffic periods, then network availability is maintained, but service quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork availabilityVSAvoidservice disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts upgrade scheduling based on real-time traffic conditions and service quality metrics. Instead of fixed scheduling, the upgrade timing adapts to changing network conditions, performing upgrades when traffic patterns indicate minimal impact on service quality while maintaining overall network availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the timing parameter of software upgrades based on analyzed traffic patterns and service quality metrics. By adjusting the temporal parameter of when upgrades occur according to measured network conditions, the system avoids high-traffic periods while maintaining availability during necessary maintenance windows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automatic upgrade scheduling is implemented, then operational costs are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automatic upgrade system is segmented into distinct functional modules: traffic analysis component, upgrade condition evaluation component, and execution component. Each module performs a specific function, making the overall complex system manageable through modular design while maintaining operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If frequent software upgrades are performed, then service quality is improved, but network stability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidnetwork stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs software upgrades selectively based on analyzed conditions rather than on a fixed schedule. By applying upgrades only when traffic patterns and service quality metrics indicate appropriate timing, the system avoids unnecessary disruptions while ensuring upgrades occur when they will most benefit service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12519694B2Method and apparatus for upgrading radio access network in a communication system
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12519694B2 patent drawing
  • US12519694B2 patent drawing
  • US12519694B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pre-5th-Generation (5G) or 5G communication system for supporting higher data rates Beyond 4th-Generation (4G) communication system such as Long Term Evolution (LTE). Method and/or electronic device for managing a software upgrade of a network element of a radio access network (RAN) by a management data analytics service (MDAS) producer is provided. The method comprises: receiving a request related to an optimal time for the software upgrade of the network element in the RAN, from a MDAS consumer; identifying information related to a dedicated radio bearer (DRB); identifying information related to the optimal time for the software upgrade of the network element based on the information related to the DBR; and transmitting a report including the information related to the optimal time for the software upgrade of the network element.