Random Access Coverage Enhancement for Reduced-Capability UEs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complexity reduction techniques in REDCAP UEs, such as reduced number of antennas and bandwidth, result in coverage degradation due to loss of frequency diversity and spatial multiplexing, necessitating methods for coverage enhancement in wireless communication networks.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a coverage enhancement indicator prior to the UE achieving an RRC connected state, using techniques like repetition in the time domain, frequency hopping, or lower MCS tables, to enhance coverage during the random access procedure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If complexity reduction techniques are applied to REDCAP UEs (reduced number of antennas and bandwidth), then device complexity is reduced, but coverage is degraded due to loss of frequency diversity and spatial multiplexing

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE complexityVSAvoidcoverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by configuring coverage enhancement parameters before the UE enters RRC connected state. The network sends coverage enhancement configuration in system information or RRC release message, enabling the UE to apply appropriate coverage enhancement techniques (like repetition or frequency hopping) during random access procedure, thereby compensating for the coverage loss from complexity reduction before actual data transmission begins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by dynamically adjusting coverage enhancement parameters based on UE capability and channel conditions. The network can configure different repetition factors, frequency hopping patterns, or MCS tables for REDCAP UEs versus legacy UEs, allowing the system to optimize coverage for reduced-complexity devices without impacting overall network performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If reduced bandwidth is used in REDCAP UEs, then device complexity is reduced, but frequency diversity is lost resulting in coverage degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE complexityVSAvoidcoverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring frequency hopping parameters and repetition factors for REDCAP UEs before they enter connected mode. This allows the UE to immediately apply frequency diversity techniques during random access, compensating for the reduced bandwidth limitation from the outset

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dimensionality change by introducing time-domain repetition and frequency-domain hopping as additional dimensions for achieving diversity. Since REDCAP UEs have reduced bandwidth (limiting frequency diversity), the patent compensates by repeating transmissions multiple times across different time instances and frequency locations, thereby recovering coverage through diversity in time and frequency dimensions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If reduced number of receive antennas is used in REDCAP UEs, then device complexity is reduced, but spatial multiplexing and diversity are reduced resulting in coverage degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE complexityVSAvoidcoverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by configuring coverage enhancement parameters before the UE enters RRC connected state. The network sends coverage enhancement configuration in system information or RRC release message, enabling the UE to apply appropriate coverage enhancement techniques (like repetition or frequency hopping) during random access procedure, thereby compensating for the coverage loss from complexity reduction before actual data transmission begins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action through time-domain repetition of transmissions. By repeating the same transport block multiple times across different time slots with appropriate spacing, the system allows the UE to accumulate energy and perform combining, thereby compensating for the reduced antenna diversity and achieving reliable reception despite having fewer receive antennas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20260067944A1Methods and apparatus for coverage enhancement in wireless communication networks
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US20260067944A1 patent drawing
  • US20260067944A1 patent drawing
  • US20260067944A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method implemented by an access node includes sending, by the access node to a user equipment (UE), an indicator indicating use of coverage enhancement technique, the indicator being sent prior to the UE achieving a radio resource control (RRC) connected state with the access node; receiving, by the access node from the UE, an uplink transmission in accordance with the indicator; and sending, by the access node to the UE, a contention resolution message in accordance with the indicator.