Random Access Response Format Selection in Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional wireless communication networks face challenges in reducing the duration and latency of the random access procedure, which consumes scarce radio resources and limits random access coverage due to the inefficiency of existing contention-based methods.

Innovation Solution

A radio network node selects a format for the random access response based on the uplink bandwidth part and information field of the message, tailoring the response size to minimize resource usage and increase coverage by omitting unnecessary fields such as TC-RNTI, C-RNTI, and TAC fields depending on the RRC state and triggering events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a fixed-size random access response format is used, then the network response structure is simple, but radio resources are wasted and random access coverage is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse format structureVSAvoidradio resource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the random access response format adaptable rather than fixed. The network node dynamically selects from multiple candidate formats based on the specific random access scenario, allowing the response structure to change according to operational needs. This resolves the contradiction by enabling resource efficiency through format variation while maintaining implementation simplicity through a predefined set of formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of response format size and structure based on different random access scenarios. By defining multiple candidate formats with different field compositions and selecting the appropriate one for each scenario, the system optimizes radio resource usage without requiring complex adaptive structuring during transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If a large random access response format is used, then all possible information is included, but radio resource consumption increases and coverage is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidradio resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary information fields for each specific random access scenario from the complete set of possible fields. By defining candidate formats that include only relevant fields for particular situations (e.g., excluding TC-RNTI when not needed), the system maintains information completeness for each scenario while reducing overall resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by tailoring the information content of each random access response to the specific local scenario. Different formats provide different levels of information detail appropriate to different situations, such as including or excluding certain identifier fields based on whether timing advance is needed or whether this is an initial access scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If the random access response includes all fields for all scenarios, then it is universally applicable, but the response size increases and coverage decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescenario adaptabilityVSAvoidrandom access coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves scenario adaptability through dynamic format selection from multiple candidate formats rather than using a single fixed format. The network node selects the appropriate format based on the specific random access scenario, maintaining versatility while keeping each individual response size optimized for its intended use case, thereby preserving coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If the random access procedure uses traditional 4-step contention-based method, then the procedure is reliable, but the duration and latency are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess procedure reliabilityVSAvoidprocedure duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by condensing the random access procedure into 2 steps instead of 4, performing necessary actions in advance or combining steps. The wireless device transmits both the random access preamble and uplink data together in one message, and the network node responds with a single combined response message, eliminating intermediate steps and reducing overall procedure duration while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230232458A1Random Access Response in a Wireless Communication Network
Publication Date: 2023.07.20 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20230232458A1 patent drawing
  • US20230232458A1 patent drawing
  • US20230232458A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments herein include a method performed by a radio network node (12) configured for use in a wireless communication network (10). The method comprises receiving a message (16) of a procedure for random access by a wireless device (14) to a cell served by the radio network node (12). The method also comprises selecting, as a function of on which uplink bandwidth part (30-0 . . . 30-N) of the cell the message (16) was received and/or as a function of an information field (16A) of the message (16), a format of a random access response (18) to be transmitted as a response to the message (16). The method also comprises transmitting the random access response (18) with the selected format (16).