Random Fiber Mat Composite Strength Formability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fiber-reinforced composite materials with thermoplastic resin matrices face challenges in achieving isotropy, high tensile strength, and high tensile modulus due to limitations in fiber volume content ratio and alignment, particularly with random mats using cut fibers.

Innovation Solution

A random mat comprising reinforcing fibers with specific fiber width distribution, dispersion ratio, and thickness, combined with a thermoplastic resin, where fibers are randomly aligned to enhance mechanical strength and isotropy, allowing for a higher volume content ratio of reinforcing fibers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the volume content ratio of reinforcing fibers is increased to improve mechanical properties, then the mechanical strength improves, but the formability deteriorates due to fiber entanglements and three-dimensional directionality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcing fiber bundle is divided into multiple sub-bundles, with each sub-bundle containing a specific number of fibers (e.g., 10-100 fibers). This segmentation reduces fiber entanglement while maintaining high volume content ratio, enabling both improved mechanical strength and formability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent specifies different structural characteristics for different parts of the fiber assembly: sub-bundles are arranged in specific orientations (0° and 90° directions) while maintaining local randomness within each sub-bundle. This local quality control enables both formability and mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If continuous fibers are used to maximize strength development, then the strength development ratio increases, but the processing convenience and formability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength development ratioVSAvoidprocessing convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fiber length parameter to a specific range (10mm to 100mm) that balances strength development with processing convenience. This intermediate length allows sufficient strength development while maintaining ease of handling and forming, avoiding the difficulties of both continuous and very short fibers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If chopped fibers are used to improve formability, then the processing convenience improves, but the strength development ratio decreases to 50% or less of theoretical value

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing convenienceVSAvoidstrength development ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting fibers into controlled sub-bundles rather than random chopping, the patent maintains processing convenience while improving strength development. The structured segmentation allows better fiber orientation and load transfer compared to random chopped fibers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure combining oriented sub-bundles with a thermoplastic resin matrix. This composite approach enables both formability (through the organized structure) and improved strength development (through controlled fiber orientation and resin impregnation).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11168186B2Random mat and fiber-reinforced composite material shaped product
Publication Date: 2021.11.09 TEIJIN LTD
  • US11168186B2 patent drawing
  • US11168186B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a reinforcing fiber mat including a reinforcing fiber mat constituted by reinforcing fibers having an average fiber length of 3 to 100 mm. The reinforcing fibers satisfy the following i) to iv): i) a weight-average fiber width (Ww) of the reinforcing fibers satisfies the following Equation (1):0.03 mm<Ww<5.0 mm   (1);ii) an average fiber width dispersion ratio (Ww/Wn) defined as a ratio of the weight-average fiber width (Ww) to a number-average fiber width (Wn) of the reinforcing fibers is 1.8 or more and 20.0 or less; iii) a weight-average fiber thickness of the reinforcing fibers is smaller than the weight-average fiber width (Ww); and iv) a fiber width distribution of the reinforcing fibers included in the reinforcing fiber mat has at least two peaks.