Random Forest Classifier for Semiconductor Defect Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current defect inspection methods in semiconductor manufacturing face high nuisance rates due to high sensitivity settings in optical inspection tools, requiring extensive manual filtering and labor to differentiate between defects and nuisances.

Innovation Solution

A defect inspection system utilizing a random forest classifier with decision trees and confidence values to automatically filter out nuisances and prioritize high-confidence defects for microscopic review, reducing manual labor and enhancing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If optical inspection tools are run at very high sensitivity to detect sub-design-rule defects, then defect detection capability is improved, but nuisance rate increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidnuisance rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the defect inspection process into multiple stages: initial high-sensitivity optical scanning to capture all potential defects, followed by systematic filtering through multiple criteria (image quality assessment, defect characteristic analysis, spatial relationship evaluation). This segmentation allows the system to maintain high detection sensitivity while systematically eliminating nuisances at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different evaluation criteria and filtering thresholds to different types of defects and different regions of the wafer. By analyzing local characteristics such as defect morphology, size, location, and contextual features, the system can distinguish between real defects and nuisances more effectively, reducing false positives while maintaining detection sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If manual filtering and operator expertise are used to differentiate defects from nuisances, then classification accuracy is improved, but time consumption and labor requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated classification system that performs defect verification and nuisance filtering without continuous human intervention. The system uses machine learning algorithms and automated decision-making protocols to independently evaluate candidate defects, apply classification rules, and filter nuisances, thereby eliminating the time-consuming manual review process while maintaining high classification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical human-operated filtering process with an automated computational system. Instead of relying on operators to manually examine and classify each defect candidate, the system uses computer vision algorithms, pattern recognition, and automated decision-making to perform the same function, dramatically reducing time consumption and labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If extensive manual exploration of feature space and fine-tuning of decision tree cuts is performed, then filtering effectiveness is improved, but labor requirements and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltering effectivenessVSAvoidlabor requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated feature selection and parameter optimization that performs extensive exploration of the feature space without human intervention. The system automatically identifies relevant features, optimizes decision thresholds, and fine-tunes classification parameters through self-learning and adaptive algorithms, thereby achieving effective filtering without requiring manual labor for feature exploration and parameter tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs automated parameter optimization techniques that dynamically adjust filtering thresholds, decision tree cut values, and classification parameters based on the specific characteristics of the inspection data. This automated parameter tuning achieves effective filtering adaptively without requiring manual fine-tuning, reducing labor requirements while maintaining or improving filtering effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10809635B2Defect inspection method and defect inspection system
Publication Date: 2020.10.20 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US10809635B2 patent drawing
  • US10809635B2 patent drawing
  • US10809635B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A defect inspection method and a defect inspection system are provided. In the method, a plurality of candidate defect images are retrieved from inspection images obtained by at least one optical inspection tool performing hot scans on at least one wafer and a plurality of attributes are extracted from the inspection images. A random forest classifier including a plurality of decision trees for classifying the candidate defect images is created, wherein the decision trees are built with different subset of the attributes and the candidate defect images. A plurality of candidate defect images are retrieved from the optical inspection tool in runtime and applied to the decision trees, and classified into nuisance images and real defect images according to votes of the decision trees in which the nuisance images are filtered out. The real defect images with the votes over a confidence value are sampled for microscopic review.