Random-Key Optimization for Robotic Sequencing Plans

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computing systems face challenges in generating optimal sequencing plans for complex systems, such as robotic movements in manufacturing facilities, due to computational capacity limitations, which hinder efficient task completion and collision avoidance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing random key optimization techniques, specifically the biased random-key genetic algorithm (BRKGA) and dual annealing, to iteratively search for solutions to sequencing plan optimization problems, combined with decoding mechanisms to generate feasible motion plans for robots, and utilizing quantum annealing devices for enhanced problem-solving capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If exact optimization methods are used for sequencing plans, then solution optimality is improved, but computational time and complexity increase exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution optimalityVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the discrete sequencing problem into a continuous optimization problem by mapping sequence positions to continuous values in the range (0,1). This parameter transformation enables the use of efficient continuous optimization algorithms instead of exhaustive discrete search methods, resolving the contradiction between solution quality and computational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical combinatorial optimization approaches with quantum annealing computation. By formulating the sequencing problem as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model and solving it using quantum annealing, the system achieves better optimization performance with reduced computational time compared to classical exact methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If comprehensive sequencing constraints are enforced, then solution feasibility is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution feasibilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates all sequencing constraints into the objective function formulation before optimization begins. By encoding constraints such as resource availability, task dependencies, and collision avoidance directly into the QUBO model's energy landscape, the method ensures feasibility is built-in from the start rather than requiring complex post-processing or iterative constraint checking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple sequencing constraints into a unified objective function. Rather than handling each constraint separately through multiple computational passes or complex constraint satisfaction algorithms, all constraints are combined into a single energy minimization problem that the quantum annealer solves in one computation, reducing overall computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If quantum annealing is used for optimization, then solution quality is improved, but hardware availability and accessibility are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization qualityVSAvoidhardware accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a hybrid quantum-classical framework where the quantum annealer serves as an optional intermediary for solving the QUBO formulation. The system can operate in quantum mode when quantum hardware is accessible for high-quality solutions, or fall back to classical solvers when quantum hardware is unavailable, thus maintaining versatility while enabling access to superior optimization capabilities when possible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12447617B1Random key optimization for generating sequencing plans
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12447617B1 patent drawing
  • US12447617B1 patent drawing
  • US12447617B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Random key optimization is used to generate sequencing plans. An optimization problem is obtained to generate a sequencing plan. The optimization problem may be described according to nodes that represent decision variables of the optimization problem. A random optimization key technique may be applied to determine a vector of respective values for the nodes. The vector of respective values of the nodes may be decoded according to a sequence planning constraint to generate the sequencing plan and determine a fitness score for the sequencing plan.