Random Phase Multiple Access for Collision Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication systems face challenges in managing multiple access scenarios without orthogonal codes, leading to collisions and inefficiencies in data transmission, particularly in spread-spectrum technologies like CDMA, where collisions can occur and complicate demodulation.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a random phase multiple access communication interface that uses a pseudo-noise code with randomly selected chip offsets for all users, allowing for non-coordinated data transmission without unique codes, and employing a PN array despreader at the access point to manage collisions through retransmission with new offsets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If orthogonal codes are used for multiple access in CDMA, then collision detection is possible, but device complexity and code assignment overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection capabilityVSAvoidcode assignment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the orthogonal code requirement from the system, allowing multiple access without orthogonal codes. Users transmit using the same PN code with different random time offsets, eliminating the need for complex orthogonal code assignment while maintaining collision detection through energy-based methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter from orthogonal codes to random time offsets. Instead of assigning different orthogonal codes to different users, the system uses the same PN code with randomly selected time offsets, transforming the multiple access mechanism while reducing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If unique orthogonal codes are assigned to each user, then simultaneous transmission is enabled, but system overhead and initialization time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimultaneous transmission capabilityVSAvoidinitialization time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the single PN code universal for all users. Instead of each user having a unique orthogonal code, all users share the same PN code and differentiate through random time offsets, reducing initialization overhead while maintaining simultaneous transmission capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary random offset selection at each transmission opportunity rather than pre-assigning orthogonal codes. This allows users to immediately transmit with randomly selected offsets, eliminating code assignment overhead and initialization delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If random time offsets are used without orthogonal codes, then device complexity is reduced, but collision resolution becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode assignment complexityVSAvoidcollision resolution ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback through acknowledgment messages. When a user transmits with a random offset, the system sends an acknowledgment to confirm successful reception. If no acknowledgment is received, the user knows a collision occurred and can select a new random offset for retransmission, making collision resolution straightforward despite the simplified access mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7702290B1Dynamic energy control
Publication Date: 2010.04.20 INGENU INC
  • US7702290B1 patent drawing
  • US7702290B1 patent drawing
  • US7702290B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for uplink transmission includes determining a channel loss that occurs along a communication channel between an access point and a tag. An uplink spreading factor is determined based at least in part on the loss factor and at least in part on a predetermined power at which the access point is to receive an uplink signal from the tag. The uplink signal is spread with the uplink spreading factor. The uplink signal is transmitted from the tag to the access point.