Randomized Message Delay for Latency Arbitrage in Trading Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In high-frequency trading systems, latency issues create an unfair advantage for traders with faster technology, leading to increased spending on expensive hardware and barriers to entry for new trading venues, as market makers are forced to invest in low-latency solutions to avoid being 'picked off' by faster competitors.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced to compensate for latency effects by applying a randomized delay to certain messages in a distributed computer system, ensuring that messages with lower latency are not guaranteed to reach the message processing device before those with greater latency, thereby leveling the playing field and reducing the incentive to invest in expensive latency-reducing technology.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traders invest in faster technology to reduce latency, then their trading speed and responsiveness improve, but system costs increase and barriers to entry rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage delivery speedVSAvoidtechnology investment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary randomised delays to messages before they are processed, proactively compensating for latency differences before they can create unfair advantages. This prevents the need for continuous investment in faster hardware by equalizing delivery times at the message level rather than requiring speed improvements at the hardware level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If market makers submit resting orders to gain time priority, then execution certainty improves, but they become vulnerable to latency arbitrage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder execution certaintyVSAvoidlatency arbitrage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the harmful effect of latency differences into a beneficial equalizing mechanism by applying randomised delays. Messages that would otherwise arrive too quickly (causing latency arbitrage) are deliberately delayed, transforming the problem of speed differences into a solution that ensures fair processing while maintaining execution certainty for resting orders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Adaptability or versatility

If new trading venues are established, then market competition and liquidity improve, but connection costs create barriers to entry

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrading venue diversityVSAvoidconnection cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces expensive, permanent infrastructure investments (high-speed hardware, co-location) with a cheaper, software-based solution (randomised delay algorithm). This disposable computational approach to latency management allows new venues to compete without bearing the prohibitive costs of building and maintaining ultra-low-latency infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS10305786B2Data processing and analysis system and method
Publication Date: 2019.05.28 MAVEN SECURITIES HLDG
  • US10305786B2 patent drawing
  • US10305786B2 patent drawing
  • US10305786B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of processing messages within a distributed computer system in order to compensate for latency effects within the distributed computer system, the distributed computer system comprising a plurality of user devices and a message processing device, the method comprising: receiving a message from a user device at a message management device; determining if the received message corresponds to a message type that requires compensation for latency delays; and, in the event that the message does not require compensation, forwarding the message to the message processing device; and, in the event that the message does require compensation for latency effects, calculating a randomized delay period, and holding the message at the message management device for the calculated delay period and subsequently forwarding the message to the message processing device.