Randomized Micro-Features in Touch Sensor Meshes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Capacitive touch sensors often suffer from optical interference, such as moiré patterns, which distort or reduce the clarity of displays visible through them due to repeating patterns in the conductive material, affecting their functionality and user experience.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of substantially randomized micro-features in the conductive material of touch sensors, such as Voronoi diagrams and sinusoidal shapes for conductive lines, reduces or eliminates repeating patterns and frequencies, thereby minimizing optical interference and enhancing display clarity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If repeating patterns are used in conductive material, then manufacturing is easier, but optical interference occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidoptical interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by replacing repeating symmetric patterns with asymmetric, randomized micro-features in the conductive material. The micro-features have randomized positions, sizes, and shapes that break the periodicity causing moiré patterns, thereby eliminating optical interference while remaining manufacturable through standard photolithography processes with adjusted design rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by allowing different regions of the conductive material to have locally optimized micro-feature configurations. Each region can have micro-features tailored to local requirements for electrical performance and optical clarity, with randomized parameters adjusted according to position-specific needs rather than applying a uniform pattern throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If randomized micro-features are implemented, then optical interference is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical interferenceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying micro-feature parameters (size, shape, position, orientation) within defined ranges to achieve randomized configurations. This controlled randomization eliminates optical interference while maintaining manufacturability through standardized fabrication processes, avoiding the need for complex assembly or post-processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If repeating patterns are used in conductive material, then manufacturing precision is easier to maintain, but visual clarity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing precisionVSAvoiddisplay clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates moiré patterns by replacing repeating symmetric patterns with asymmetric, randomized micro-features. The randomization breaks the periodicity that causes optical interference, significantly improving display clarity through the touch sensor while maintaining manufacturing precision through controlled variation of micro-feature parameters within defined tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces or eliminates moiré patterns and optical interference, improving the visual clarity of displays through touch sensors while maintaining the touch sensing functionality, thereby enhancing user interaction and device performance.

Implementation Method 1

Capacitive touch sensors often suffer from optical interference issues, such as moire patterns, due to repeating patterns in their conductive material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical interference: Interference

Implementation Method 2

optical interference issues, such as moire patterns

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoiré effect: Moiré Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8963561B2Randomizing one or more micro-features of a touch sensor
Publication Date: 2015.02.24 BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD
  • US8963561B2 patent drawing
  • US8963561B2 patent drawing
  • US8963561B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, an apparatus includes a touch sensor with one or more meshes of conductive material. Each of the meshes includes multiple mesh cells defined by multiple mesh segments. Each of the mesh cells includes a centroid and multiple vertices. The mesh segments are made of the conductive material, and the centroids or vertices of the mesh cells have a substantially random distribution within an area of the touch sensor. The apparatus also includes one or more computer-readable non-transitory storage media coupled to the touch sensor that embody logic that is configured when executed to control the touch sensor.