Controlled Randomized Porous Structures for Orthopedic Implants

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical implants, particularly orthopedic implants, face challenges in achieving a balance between strength for weight-bearing purposes and porosity for tissue ingrowth, while also lacking connectivity and resembling trabecular bone structures.

Innovation Solution

The development of controlled, randomized porous structures with improved strength, porosity, and connectivity is achieved by creating a three-dimensional model with randomized spatial coordinates and struts, and fabricating these structures using rapid manufacturing techniques such as direct metal fabrication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional metal foam fabrication methods are used, then porosity is achieved, but strength is insufficient for weight bearing purposes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidporosity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the structural parameters of the porous metal by controlling strut thickness, pore size distribution, and spatial arrangement through advanced fabrication methods. This allows optimization of both strength and porosity by adjusting geometric parameters rather than relying on conventional foam structures with fixed properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite structure combining metal struts with controlled porosity, effectively integrating the strength of solid metal with the tissue-ingrowth benefits of porous structures. The hierarchical pore structure creates a composite-like behavior that simultaneously provides mechanical support and biological functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Quantity of substance

If powdered metal is mixed with pore-forming agent and sintered, then porosity is formed, but undesirable metal compounds are created by reaction between metal and PFA

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveporosityVSAvoidundesirable metal compounds
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the pore-forming agent step from the fabrication process. Instead of using PFAs that require removal and cause harmful reactions, the method directly creates porous structures through controlled deposition or space-holder techniques, removing the source of harmful metal compound formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces an intermediary approach where organic binders or waxes are used temporarily to define pore spaces, then completely removed through controlled decomposition. This intermediary material serves as a template without directly reacting with the metal to form harmful compounds, unlike conventional PFAs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If conventional fabrication processes are used, then metal foam is formed, but substantial energy is consumed and noxious fumes are produced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveporosityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces high-energy thermal processes with lower-energy fabrication methods. Instead of extensive sintering and burnout cycles that consume substantial energy, the method uses controlled deposition, field-assisted sintering, or additive manufacturing techniques that require significantly less energy input to achieve the same porous structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the processing parameters from high-temperature, long-duration conventional sintering to lower-temperature, shorter-duration processes. By optimizing parameters such as deposition temperature, sintering time, and atmospheric conditions, the method achieves porous structure formation with reduced energy consumption and minimal fume generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If uniform porous structures are used, then manufacturing is simplified, but connectivity and resemblance to trabecular bone is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidconnectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality variations within the porous structure, creating regions with different pore sizes, strut thicknesses, and connectivity patterns. This mimics the natural heterogeneity of trabecular bone, providing optimal local conditions for both tissue ingrowth and mechanical load bearing while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces dynamic characteristics to the porous structure by creating graded porosity and connectivity that adapt to functional requirements. The structure transitions from uniform static designs to dynamically optimized configurations where pore distribution and strut arrangement vary spatially to enhance connectivity and biological performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in porous structures that provide enhanced strength, improved porosity, and increased connectivity, closely resembling trabecular bone structures, thereby promoting better tissue integration and mechanical performance.

Implementation Method 1

DMF techniques produce three-dimensional structures one layer at a time from a powder which is solidified by irradiating a layer of the powder with an energy source such as a laser or an electron beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 2

DMF techniques produce three-dimensional structures one layer at a time from a powder which is solidified by irradiating a layer of the powder with an energy source such as a laser or an electron beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 3

The powder is fused, melted or sintered, by the application of the energy source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS12285547B2Controlled randomized porous structures and methods for making same
Publication Date: 2025.04.29 SMITH & NEPHEW INC
  • US12285547B2 patent drawing
  • US12285547B2 patent drawing
  • US12285547B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Improved randomized porous structures and methods of manufacturing such porous structures are disclosed. The scaffold of the porous structures are formed from by dividing the space between a plurality of spatial coordinates of a defined volume, where the plurality of spatial coordinates have been moved in a random direction and a random finite distance according to a predetermined randomization limit.